Morning Call [6:42am ET] Today is one of those days you are going to hear on too many occasions the words “monster quarter” and “blow-out earnings”. On days like this, the financial pages are just like the sports pages – you know the quotes like “I gave it 110%” or “He or she brought everything to the table”. We seem to be caught up in the pressures of time so that even things that are important must be compressed to six-second sound bites and bullet points on a page. I prefer a more thoughtful approach, using judgment and skill to assess the current situation in an ongoing effort to buy and sell before the crowd.
This weekend in the WIR, I wrote about Intel (INTC). I encouraged you to buy. In fact, comparing INTC to IBM (IBM) and Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), all of which I liked for the immediate term despite Wall Street titans like Barton Biggs advising you at the end of last week to sell, sell, sell, I wrote the following:
I saved the best for last: Intel (INTC).
Here are the charts for INTC ($20.24 7/09 close; down -10.24% in 2Q2010 (Previously: $22.55 4/09 close, up +$1.72 (+8.26%) from its close at $20.83 13 weeks prior to that on 1/08, which was up +3.3% vs $20.17 at the 10/9 close;):
http://billcara2.com/tkchart/tkchart.asp?stkname=INTC&ind=rsi&wt=3
http://billcara2.com/tkchart/tkchart.asp?stkname=INTC&ind=rsi&wt=1
http://billcara2.com/tkchart/tkchart.asp?stkname=INTC&ind=rsi&wt=0At 7/09, the RSI-7 for the Monthly/Weekly/Daily for INTC was 51.3 (has fallen a lot) / 43.3 (has fallen a lot) / 54.8 (down a bit from 4/09, but rising).
At 4/09, the RSI-7 for the Monthly/Weekly/Daily for INTC had 71.9 (hot) / 78.8 (danger zone) / 63.2 (blip up on Friday). That was a strong heads-up I gave you 13 weeks ago. In fact, how about the call that I made on 4/09 with the price at $22.55:
INTC looks to me like it could set a new 52-week high this week, but I wouldn’t be flirting with danger. Raise your stops. There was a Daily data SELL Alert on Apr 06 at $22.40, and Friday was up +$0.31 (+1.10%), so we’ll have to see how this one plays out. There were Distribution Zone signals on the Weekly data at 3/18 at 22.20 and 4/09 Friday on the Monthly data at 22.55.
There was in fact a 52-week high for Intel on 4/15 (i.e., the next week) at $24.37. Then my danger-alert proved timely as well as the stock closed this week at $20.24, with a low of $18.96 on July 2.
As I said, the balance sheet strength of Intel is second to none. Operationally, there has been a big turnaround. From a loss in 2Q2009 of 7 cents per share, there is likely to be a profit of about $0.43 this quarter, and big Q/Q improvements in the next couple quarters. Earnings momentum then is the name of the game here.
So now I’ll put the semi in forward gear, and tell you I like it here and for the immediate term (next couple weeks) and for the longer term. In the short-term however, i.e., from say sometime in August into Oct-Nov, I am worried about the oncoming traffic on the NASDAQ highway. The broad market might pull back in late summer. If that were to happen, it’ll be hard for INTC to move against the flow, so this one might require a gut check for some of you. But if your disposition is rather long-term, I’d buy a little here and write some puts, which will allow you either to lower your cost base or take on a bit more stock at lower prices. Don’t be shy.
The stock price at the close on Friday was $20.24. It had moved up over +5% in recent days, in the midst of a market sell-off. I wanted people to think long-term: “Buy a little here and write some puts, which will allow you either to lower your cost base or take on a bit more stock at lower prices. Don’t be shy.” INTC opened Monday at $20.31 and had a low of $20.30, so you didn’t have to miss it.
After the close yesterday (Tuesday), Intel reported a “monster quarter” with “blow-out earnings” and today the stock could hit $23, a three-day move of about +15%.
If you listen to Wall Street you’d have been like a deer caught in headlights, and that’s why I constantly advise you to tune out of Financial Entertainment TV and tune in to actual corporate data and market prices.
Seeking Alpha carried a blogger’s in-depth summary of the Intel results. I haven’t had the time to read it, but it’s probably informative, and much more so than what you’ll find on Bloomberg and CNBC from talking heads who are speaking for somebody’s interests other than your own.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/214376-in-depth-analysis-of-intel-s-q2?s...
So, today, with Intel driving enthusiasm into equity markets, prices are likely to lift again. Summer rally time.
[WIR Wrap-up] Time to go, but I’ll leave you with these comments that if the international markets can stay positive overnight and the S&P can open slightly up or down on Monday, I think we’ll see what will be called a “summer rally” continuing through next week. I don’t expect much to come of it, possibly +2.5% to +3.0% more on the S&P to 1120, and then traders will have another assessment after looking over the corporate earnings reports, the macro-economic data, forex, bond yields, sovereign debt, and commodity prices at that point.
Funny, I didn’t read that anywhere except in the Bill Cara Blog.
Another thing you are unlikely to hear today is the advice to not get caught up in chasing INTC. The price has come a long way since July 2’s low of $19.01. If it hits $23 today, that’s a $4 lift, which would be a gain of +20% off the low in just seven trading days, which is a lot for a mega cap stock like Intel ($117 billion as of yesterday). The price will fluctuate: buy low and sell high. Get in the habit.
The equity futures are presently down and bonds are up, represently a safe-haven from risk, but not to worry. Intel is carrying the flag today.
Have a great day.
CTA Trading Desk Post-Close Report
The “best quarterly earnings report ever” from Intel (INTC+1.81%) sparked an opening +6% pop in its stock, propelling the broad averages to weekly highs before profit taking set in as the S&P approached 1100. Intel then steadily sold off as the day progressed. The rest of the nondescript session featured low volume with sellers unable to push prices lower; each dip bought by traders sensing the bottom is in for equity prices.
If the market were in a weak position, the popular averages would have succumbed to the selling pressure and finished much lower on the day. Since the market repelled several attempts to auction appreciably lower (S&P-0.02%) one has to conclude shorts got trapped on the false breakdown of 1040 and are desperately trying to cover positions on any weakness.
Regardless of your “feelings” about the state of the economy or where you think prices “should” be trading, successful traders must pay close attention to price action allowing the market to reveal its true intentions. While the TRIN registered a very high reading today – meaning a lot of selling was coming into the market – prices remained firm, a sign buyers are waiting in the wings to buy on weakness.
The VIX finished up 1.35% at a relatively elevated reading of 24.9, rising option premiums a rare occurrence in the middle of a summer expiry week with equity prices flat on the day. Normally the mechanics of option rollovers executed during expiry week force premiums decidedly lower unless the market is in the throes of a significant sell-off. If this market doesn’t quickly break to the downside, the purchasers of this high implied volatility are going to be staring at sizable losses.
Expectations remain for some sort of tepid pullback, a pause that refreshes the market; as long as the S&P can hold 1050 it appears the market wants to trade higher. Resistance levels remain unchanged from those mentioned last night.
Have a great evening.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Blog_Jul_14.1.GIF | 39.26 KB |
| Blog_Jul_14.2.GIF | 24.06 KB |
| Blog_Jul_14.3.GIF | 119.97 KB |
Comments
Couple of stories from the FT which caught my eye today
Senators question BP’s Libyan links
http://bit.ly/9xok7V
Pimco caught out by strength of gilts
http://bit.ly/bNZsxB
anyone get a handle on % effect of currency exchange
rate at INTC ?
Re: rally today: explained by Bloomberg! (repost)
Housing?
Well, around my northern Illinois neighborhood nearly all the same houses are for sale as a year ago. (2 of 12 have either sold or been abandoned) Two or three have been added to the market recently. One has been vacant after having been bought last year and a July 5, auction failed to draw bidders.
The problem IS the job market is worse than 12 months ago. I think it safe to assume several of these would not be on the market if the owners still had good jobs.
A property directly behind our house was taken off the market due to real estate agents giving the owner such a low likely sale price that he is now commuting daily to Milwaukee — the nearest he could find work.
Obama and Congress need to wake up — keep your grandiose plans — people want work and you're killing the economy!
Reversal in mining stocks (were positive)
BHP Billiton -1.19%, Rio Tinto -0.83%
Cara 100 Ratings Changes
Good morning.
FSLR - First Solar coverage assumed with a Hold at Jefferies. Target $138
GOOG - PT Lowered from $690 to $675 @ Stifel Nicolaus. Buy
INTC - PT Raised from $30 to $32 @ FBR. Market Perform
In tza. Pre mkt
$34 cost basis. 32.xx stop.
Goal is to begin building a larger position for swing trade, but open to closing out position when price action dictates.
Re: Reversal in mining stocks (were positive)
Mark H,
Actually, I'm now not happy with the look of the S&P's this morning, despite INTC. Moreover, I haven't like the action since mid-day Friday. With the plunging Dollar yesterday, I got sucked back in, but even though the Dollar kept falling, and I was awaiting lift-off, nothing happened. Now with AA and INTC fired up and it's still a case of nothing happening, it's possible the banksters are going to pull the S&P down until they get the votes to push the legislation on so-called financial services reform. If they don't get that done now, I think the next attempt will be worse for them.
Re: rally today: explained by Bloomberg! (repost)
While the market may not be significantly correlated with the economy, it plays a factor and these are worth considering in the near future:
In short, the risk of recession is increasing, but we do not yet have the evidence to indicate that a recession is imminent or inevitable. Important data to monitor in the next few months will be the ISM figures, consumer confidence (especially a sharp drop), employment, hours worked, and capacity utilization.
---From Hussman Funds 7-13-2010
spx
now hitting 50 and 200 DEMA.
Cara 100 Update (Final)
AMZN - numbers reduced at UBS. AMZN estimates were cut through 2011. Company will be hurt by the stronger dollar. Buy rating and new $170 price target.
BA - estimate cut at BofA/Merrill. BA 2010 EPS estimate lowered to $3.98 from $4.00 after Boeing's deliveries were lighter than expected in the second quarter. Maintain Buy rating and $90 price target.
INTC - price target higher at Citi to $32 from $30. Beat & raise bodes well for 2H seasonality. Maintain Buy rating.
INTC - estimates higher at Barclays. INTC 2010 and 2010 EPS estimates increased to $2.08 and $2.14, respectively. Barclays cited robust 2Q10 results and strong guidance. Maintain Overweight rating and $26 price target.
INTC - estimates increased at UBS through 2011. Higher prices are driving record gross margins. Buy rating and $30 price target.
Re: rally today: explained by Bloomberg! (repost)
"we do not yet have the evidence to indicate that a recession is imminent or inevitable"
What I get from consumer metrics suggests that a double dip in consumer spending is already happening. Presumably as the consumer goes, so goes the rest of the economy.
INTC kangaroo tail reversal
surprised no one mentioned the one on yesterday's chart.
FD: long SSG
Re: spx
thanks a retest of the "Death Cross"
keep in mind, it's expiry
keep in mind, it's expiry week.
I am thinking enough bears were punished and scared out of positions, and now it's time to batter the bulls a bit.
Re: rally today: explained by Bloomberg! (repost)
"In short, the risk of recession is increasing, but we do not yet have the evidence to indicate that a recession is imminent or inevitable. Important data to monitor in the next few months will be the ISM figures, consumer confidence (especially a sharp drop), employment, hours worked, and capacity utilization."
Recession? Depends who you ask.
According to Van Hoisington the National Bureau of Economic Research is not willing to say the recession ever ended. They say the ratio of people employed to total population has fallen from 62.7% 12-2009 to 58.5% today.
http://www.hoisingtonmgt.com/
market's reaction is what counts
So what was the market's reaction to Intel's blockbuster quarter? Certainly from the point of view of the premarket, INTC sold off - at least as of right now. And the volume is big - in 45 minutes of trading, INTC has done a full day's trading volume. Perhaps that's why Bill suggested we not chase INTC after a 20% gain in 7 days.
And AA, who exceeded expectations yesterday is off slightly today as well, after also having a big volume day and selling off at the open. With VIX and TLT clearly in the green, I'm not seeing "blastoff" here. I think they call this distribution. It certainly doesn't make me want to buy.
Of course we still have the rest of the day ahead, so we will see how things play out.
Re: market's reaction is what counts
davefairtex,
This market in many respects is like rolling dice in a casino. Look at the 15-minute chart of GDXJ. Unless you know about the next day's gap open, there is no way to effectively trade the market. Four days in a row of gap up or down followed (for first two days anyway) by no volatility whatsoever. If you were trapped (long or short), you could not trade out of it. All you can do is pray, while the powers that be are picking off the trading mistakes by traders who panic. Today may turn out a tad better for GDXJ as there seems to be some normality to the past hour. But, this is tough.
Re: market's reaction is what counts
Bill likened trading to driving a race car. Its intense. You can't take your eyes off the road even for a second. This is Vad's world. I traded INTC profitably twice today. I am compelled to trade fast to cope with the high velocity folks. I need a nap now.
Flow
When I say that trading is tough, I mean the market is more choppy than normal between the higher and lower gaps. During the day, the RSI is stuck between 30 and 70 and looks like the ragged edge of a hacksaw. There is no flow to prices. You don't know when there is going to be a break-out in either direction because there is no build-up; it just happens -- usually overnight.
If the major capital managers keep this up, they'll soon be trading 99% of the market by themselves, and the rest of us will stay on the sidelines.
We need more true liquidity and less HFT computer algo trading. The regulators should have blown up those flash traders because in spite of anything they have to say about providing a market function, they are ruining the market. When I trade, for instance, I am trading the market technicals, corporate fundamentals, news, and market price inter-relationships. All the flash traders are doing is diddling the order flow and encouraging speculators. This is not the way capital markets are supposed to work.
Investor Intel
Chart bull - bear standoff
news driving gold?
Gold spiked about $7 a few moments ago. Any news?
EDIT: euro also taking off
Re: INTC kangaroo tail reversal
That reversal stick didn't print on my 15min or 60min charts. It did print on the daily. With the HTF flashing bids, the 22.28 may not be a good print? Just a guess.
Question for Vad re DCTH
Vad - You have talked in the past about those stocks where the 'smart money' is doing the 'heavy lifting'. Would you consider DCTH to be a case of that??
Thanks, Kyle
Re: INTC kangaroo tail reversal
Not sure we can blame HFT for bad ticks. Bad ticks have been around forever...and I should also note bids don't generate price data for charts, only executions do.
It looks like a bad tick to me.
Re: INTC kangaroo tail reversal
dunno.
Stockcharts.com shows it on the daily as does Yahoo finance. Etrade doesn't.
Meanwhile back at the ranch, INTC is trading almost 2X the average 10 day volume and below the open. See how it closes.
Re: Question for Vad re DCTH
Kyle,
can't tell, really. If I understand right what you refer to, it should have been the case of slow move up with no volume at first and with no or negative news. Those are usual markings of smart money starting accumulation. Here, we have quite a spike in both price and volume 4 days ago, plus news today about arrival of former President and CEO of Novartis...
What we see here is something else - which is not to say of course it won't go up more. Just different case.
Rosenberg - more food for thought
I found this extract from today's "Breakfast with Dave" interesting:
"But what about the stock market? I’m not saying it’s “manipulated” but it does have substantial “survivorship bias” — especially after a gut wrenching recession. Just cleaning the failures out of the system and erasing them from the S&P 500, from WaMu, to Wachovia, to Bear Stearns, to Lehman, to Fannie and Freddie, and replacing them with companies that survived, was responsible for nearly 40% of the rally in the market off the 2009 lows. Think about that, if those firms who went under were still in the index, according to some help from a strategy friend at an aforementioned bank, the S&P 500 would be trading closer to 900 today than 1,100."
Vad, Thanks much! I really do
Vad,
Thanks much! I really do try and understand your teachings. What I remembered came from your aug-06-2009 log re. MBI. Just thought DCTH had some of those tape movements...
[10:08] {magoo} MBI vad, take a look
[10:08] {Threei} not delighted by MBI
[10:09] {Threei} let me explain the thought process
[10:09] {Threei} MBI at this point becomes a failed breakout play,
[10:09] {Threei} it was looked at as possible runner,
[10:09] {Threei} it failed,
[10:09] {Threei} no major attention to it until and unless it retirns to 7 and breaks it,
[10:10] {Threei} so it kind of becomes a food for small pikers till then,
[10:10] {Threei} and that's not who we want to try and profit from.
[10:10] {Threei} that's hard competiton for every 5 cents
[10:10] {Threei} we want big fish to come in and run things
[10:11] {Threei} then we have kind of movement and volume giving us our risk/reqards
[10:11] {Threei} rewards too
Thanks again, Kyle
Re: Question for Vad re DCTH
not trying to butt-in on Vad.... several ' estimates ' have ' dcth ' at ' fair value ' around $ 8.00 - $ 9.00 at current growth projections ( but heck, its a traders equity, so who knows )... if interested, you might take a look at ' sppi '.. although two company officers left a couple of months ago ( one has been replaced, the other was, basically, an intermediary between company and physicians, and interviews are ongoing ) estimates are trending nicely.. will probably show its hand toward options expiration... best of trades to you...
Re: Question for Vad re DCTH
baz22... I was more interested in the Tape 'Readability' aspects on some increasing volume. SPPI is another one of those 'chicken-scratch' charts (Vol < 100k) that I'm trying to avoid. Thanks though.
Re: Vad, Thanks much! I really do
Sorry, there is no way I could compare DCTH to MBI, for one simple reason... I don't remember anything about that play from a year ago :)
Re: Vad, Thanks much! I really do
That's cool...Thanks
Re: Rosenberg - more food for thought
Changes in the components of the indexes have contributed a great deal to the perceived returns.
Go back to 1928 and look at a few of the DOW 30 stocks. (1928 was the first year there were 30 stocks in the index.' Here are a few;
American Can
Texas Gulf Sulpher
Postum Inc.
Paramount Publix
Nash Motors
General Railway Signal
Victor Talking Machine...
Generous Electric is the sole survivor. Many others survive today like GM, Woolworth, Sears Roebuck but are no longer deemed worthy for inclusion. I may be mistaken but I recall American Ice was once a DOW stock.
There has been no covert manipulation just changes to reflect the real economy over time. The next candidate to be rusticated will no doubt be Alcoa. I hope it is replaced with China Life! Nah, too unamarakin!
Re: Flow
"This is not the way capital markets are supposed to work."
I found the same thing happened to my business after globalization kicked into high gear.
For years I tried to provide my clients with the best quality I could a a price slightly lower than what I knew to be the prevailing charges from the bigger advertising studios and ad agencies. My lower overhead made this possible and I made a good living.
Then suddenly all that mattered was price and I was dealing with inexperienced people who didn't know the business — all they knew was the accountants said, "Cut cost."
Several of my competitors who were under bidding me went out of business even before I did. I made it until my last long time client disappeared in 2004.
FOMC Minutes: More stimulus?
However, members noted that in addition to continuing to develop and test instruments to exit from the period of unusually accommodative monetary policy, the Committee would need to consider whether further policy stimulus might become appropriate if the outlook were to worsen appreciably.
In theory, dollar should strengthen from here as investors seek safety in US Treasuries.
DDofI
(US) White House Advisor Romer: Weak housing data suggests a self-sustaining recovery has not taken hold (why would it if you don't let market work itself out)
- Without more aid, economic recovery will likely fail to generate the growth needed to reduce unemployment. (and with more money thrown at it it will... Sure)
- Obama Administration is looking forward to working with Congress on a plan to aid state and local businesses.(We all are looking forward to it, confident that more spending is the answer)
Sarcasm Mode Off
Re: Rosenberg - more food for thought
ALOHA!!
Yes ... then there is this one!
ENRON
Enron grew wealthy due largely to marketing, promoting power and its high stock price. Enron was named "America's Most Innovative Company" by "Fortune magazine" for six consecutive years, from 1996 to 2001. It was on the Fortune's "100 Best Companies to Work for in America" list in 2000, and had offices that were stunning in their opulence. Enron was hailed by many, including labor and the workforce, as an overall great company, praised for its large long-term pensions, benefits for its workers and extremely effective management until its exposure in corporate fraud. The first analyst to publicly disclose Enron's financial flaws was Daniel Scotto, who in August 2001 issued a report entitled "All Stressed up and no place to go" which encouraged investors to sell Enron stocks and bonds at any and all costs.
Tomorrow's 1st time unemployment claims report
Just wanted to give people a head's up that tomorrow morning is the First Time Unemployment Claims report. Last week showed a decline and the S&P500 added 10 points that day. Tomorrow could show larger than usual increase.
Zero Hedge quoted John Williams of Shadowstats “The Department of Labor cannot adjust the weekly claims numbers meaningfully for regular seasonal variations. Accordingly, reporting around holidays invariably results in unusually large and unexpected swings in the weekly numbers. Yesterday’s data covered the onset of the Fourth of July weekend. It would not be at all unusual to see a similarly-meaningless reverse-gyration in next week’s release.” http://tinyurl.com/2atemba
Congratulations Bill on the grandchild.
Wonder how many $$$$$ Cramer cost buyers of INTC
and NVDA last night ?
Re: FOMC Minutes: More stimulus?
WSJ: Federal Reserve policy makers raised the possibility at last month's rate-setting meeting that further monetary stimulus may be needed if the economy shows more serious signs of slowing, according to meeting minutes... Meanwhile, Fed officials rolled back their U.S. economic outlook for the first time in more than a year, saying a soft job market will restrain growth.
I wondered why the market was going nuts after 1:45pm ET. Like a cat on a hot tin roof.
Re: Wonder how many $$$$$ Cramer cost buyers of INTC
baz22,
Those who chased the stock got hurt. Funny how the same talking heads help the people chase the stocks -- right into the sell orders from HB&B prop traders.
Over and over and over.
Hyping INTC
Just in time for the close. Time-stamped 3:00pm ET from your Wall Street Journal:
July 14, 2010 -- 3:00 p.m. EDT
EARNINGS
Intel Surfs Wave of PC Upgrades
Intel provided dramatic proof that businesses have joined consumers in snapping up new computers, as the chip maker posted the strongest quarterly results in its history.
You know, these people are amazing!
Re: FOMC Minutes: More stimulus?
Thanks Bill. The WSJ have summed it up perfectly.
Now might be an appropriate time to quote this again.
“With household balance sheets still over-leveraged, the key determinant of consumer spending growth going forward will be the pace of the recovery in the labour market and hence the path of wage and salary income,” said Joshua Shapiro, chief US economist at MFR.
GSK: Interesting price action
Currently trading at $36.50 +2.21%
.............
tobyt...... sold ' pozn ' ( from 6.64 ) ok% ( To much like alth ).. sold orex, excellent % ... no positions at arna, orex, nor vvus... sold vnda ( from yesterday, ok % )started sppi early am... gl on vvus,arna,.. baz
Re: GSK: Interesting price action
* Vote on whether to withdraw Avandia still to come
* Panel in 2007 found heart risk but voted to keep on mkt
* Glaxo shares down 0.2 pct in New York trade
(Rewrites with vote on death risk; updates shares)
By Lisa Richwine and Susan Heavey
GAITHERSBURG, Md, July 14 (Reuters) - A majority of U.S. health advisers said GlaxoSmithKline Plc's diabetes drug Avandia did not raise a concern about the risk of death when compared with other diabetes drugs.
Twenty members of the 33-member expert panel said available data did not raise concern about the death risk associated with Avandia when compared to diabetes drugs in other classes. It was not immediately clear how many could not decide.
By a closer 12-7 margin, the panel found no death concern with Avandia versus Takeda Pharmaceutical Co's <4502.T> Actos, a drug in the same class as Avandia. 14 could not decide.
A short time earlier on Wednesday, the scientific experts found Avandia raised a heart attack concern versus other classes of diabetes drugs and when compared Actos.
A final vote on whether to recommend Avandia's withdrawal from the market is expected shortly.
Avandia's U.S. sales were just 1.5 percent of Glaxo's 2009 revenues, but investors fear the company could face more lawsuits if the drug is pulled from the market. [ID:nN1397641]
The Food and Drug Administration convened the panel of outside experts to help the agency settle a three-year safety dispute over Avandia.
It is difficult to predict how early votes may affect the final vote.
In 2007, an advisory panel voted 20-3 that Avandia may increase the chances of a heart attack for some patients, but by 22-1 recommended that the drug stay on the market.
"We believe it's likely that the drug will remain on the market but with increased warnings," said Morningstar analyst Damien Conover.
Starting Tuesday, the scientific experts heard two days of sharply conflicting opinions and reviewed hundreds of pages of data on whether Avandia causes heart attacks.
Glaxo shares were trading down 0.2 percent in New York , having closed up 0.4 percent in London.
The advisory panel is next due to vote on recommendations ranging from keeping the drug on the market with no warnings, to urging a withdrawal. Restrictions on use or beefing up warnings are among other choices.
Because the FDA asked panelists to select only one of the five options, there may be no clear majority. However, any vote short of withdrawal would back continued Avandia sales in some form. [ID:nN14270269]
The agency will make the final call in the coming months but usually follows the advice of its panels.
The debate on Avandia's safety has raged since warnings were placed on the drug in 2007 saying some research linked the drug to a higher heart attack risk but the data is "inconclusive."
Re: GSK: Interesting price action
15:35:47
Glaxosmithkline PLC *FDA ADVISORY PANEL ON AVANDIA (ROSIGLITAZONE) RECOMMENDS ALLOWING DRUG TO STAY ON THE MARKET WITH NEW RESTRICTIONS; 12 MEMBERS VOTE TO WITHDRAW FROM MARKET; 17 VOTE FOR LABEL CHANGES OF VARYING SEVERITY
- 33 total votes
- 1 abstention, 3 voters vote for no changes to current label.
Re: GSK: Interesting price action
Thanks Vadym. I think that was pretty much what was expected.
late day trading in precious metals and equities
I like what I see this afternoon. There is accumulation on the dips, and the dips seem designed to frighten the weak hands. These things happen usually before there is a price advance.
PS. If I say this, the market will reverse. :-)
Note that the Euro has this market on a string. Euro up, market up, and euro down, market down.
PROOF
ALOHA!!
Proof how effective the US FED, the US Central Bank, has been at monetary policy.
LINK: http://tinyurl.com/28vy5mt
If the cost of food isn't about "money" and its "store of value" I do not know what is. If I were the US FED I wouldn't want to count food as part of the CPI either.
More proof that since the US FED was created in 1913 America has suffered some serious currency collapse.
LINK: http://tinyurl.com/2f7yysc
Note the plunge right after 1913 ... Where is the "store of value" that defines real money?
Here I have charted the cost to prepare a tax return in America since 1997.
LINK: http://tinyurl.com/2accqdn
Not much price deflation over at H&R Block! Seems there never is price deflation when the leverage of debt is unavailable.
I use this website ECONOMAGIC as it has the most detailed economic data I have ever seen considering there is no fee.
For instance if you want to know what the CPI of "rents" are in the NorthEast part of the USA from 1982 here it is.
LINK: http://tinyurl.com/29jdube
Check out this long list of items you can track and chart at the ECONOMAGIC website.
LINK: http://www.economagic.com/blscu.htm
You can even track pet food and funeral costs!
NFIB SURVEY FALLS
ALOHA!!
Once again as a small business owner I represent the following ...
Small businesses represent more than 99 percent of all U.S. employers and have created 64 percent of all new jobs in the past 15 years, according to the U.S. Small Business Administration. A small business is defined as an independent enterprise employing up to 250 people.
My GROUND REPORT is that costs to produce a product are constantly rising as sales are constantly falling. 2+2=4 means I am not hiring!
Small-Business Confidence in U.S. Drops to Three-Month Low
July 13, 2010, 8:28 AM EDT
July 13 (Bloomberg) -- Confidence among U.S. small businesses fell in June to the lowest level in three months as projections for profits, sales and economic conditions weakened, a private survey found.
The National Federation of Independent Business’s optimism index decreased to 89 from May’s 92.2 reading that was the highest since September 2008, the Washington-based group said today. Seven of the index’s 10 components dropped, led by a decline in the economic outlook six months from now.
Smaller firms need to increase hiring and business spending to ensure the economic recovery that began a year ago is sustained. The report shows employment stalled last month while executives planned to trim investment and inventories as they waited for demand to strengthen.
“Headwinds for the economy are still strong, making forward progress difficult to make and to hold,” William Dunkelberg, the group’s chief economist, said in a statement. “The small business sector is not on a positive trajectory and with this half of the private sector missing in action, the poor growth performance is no surprise.”
“What businesses need are customers, giving them a reason to hire and make capital expenditures and borrow to support those activities,” Dunkelberg said in the statement. “But consumers are as uncertain about the future as the business owners waiting to serve them.”
The weak economy continued to help contain inflation, the survey showed. June was the 19th consecutive month that showed more small business owners cutting average selling prices than raising them, and widespread price-cutting led to declining sales.
This caught my eye the most ...
" ... and widespread price-cutting led to declining sales."
Yet my costs continue to rise ...
The best strategy I ever put in place was to own a home and business that were debt free. I did not fall into the trap of using debt to expand my business. I feel sorry for those that did as I can take you on a tour of all the failed nurseries here in Hilo. One of the oldest ones, with a PO BOX number of "1" is tops on the tour! Many nurseries lost huge sales as they lost big Japanese accounts. Times are tough and don;t let Obama or Bernanke ever con you into believing they have a solution. They're only solution is more debt. A great idea for bankers not so great for the rest of us who cannot print money.
Grayd Resources - GYD.V and Torex Gold - TXG.TO
Just thought I'd comment on a couple Mexico Gold juniors that i have positions in and have been following for awhile.
Got a nice pop into the close on GYD.V for a 52-week high. Grayd Resources has the second largest land position in the Mulatos belt in Sonora State, Mexico. (Alamos Gold has the top position). Their La India project is located 7 km northwest of Alamos Gold's Mulatos mine. With only a 75m CAD market cap and a resources of 1.25m oz at La India, I am looking for them to be taken out by Alamos in the next 1-2 years.
I also opened a position recently in Torex Gold (TXG.TO). This company was formed to purchase the Morelos Gold Project in Guerrero State, Mexico. Torex purchased a 78.8% stake from Teck Resources in Sept09 and bought the other 21.2% from GoldCorp in Dec09. Teck retained a 4.9% interest in Torex in the sale. Morelos has a 4m oz defined resource. The company just had 10m special warrants expire on July 5th which had a strike of $0.60 which I believe has contributed to the recent swoon in stock price and created a good opportunity(as warrant holders are forced to raise cash to exercise the warrants and subsequently dump stock). Torex did a $50m offering in the first quarter at $1/share and are now well capitalized with $64.7m in cash at end of Q2. 3 years down the road I see this one evolving similar to the AGI.TO or GORO.OB and believe this could be high quality mining operation. I also like that management seems to be keeping their heads down, getting the drilling done and further defining the resource and not wasting company money on excessive publicity. The company seems to have access to capital and able to raise the large sums that will be need to get the Morelos project built.
a view from a broad....(a mermaid's tail)
(apologies to Bette Midler for stealing her book title!)
Bill,
Congratulations on becoming the grandpapa of a lady in waiting for her next career move. Being born female is fortuituous in this century as the trend toward humanism and collaboration, dare I say less competitive killer me me meism is needed by our universe. So sayeth the star gazers.
Meanwhile, you might encourage your grandlass that there are some jobs where women not only excell -- but get paid more than men in these increasingly enlightened times! (unfortunately these are mostly lower paid roles so let's hope she has inherited your nose for trading!) http://tinyurl.com/38jbfes
Re: NFIB SURVEY FALLS
lets not kid ourselves. declining confidence is due to the stock market decline. it's at a 3 month low. 3 months ago the market was much higher. lets keep it simple, right? i mean, pretty much everything is related to the stock market.
Re: late day trading in precious metals and equities
couldn't agree more Bill. I think today was even more bullish than yesterday. If the market wants to get everyone off board before making its true move (which I believe is higher) it will fall a bit over the next few days to gets bears more confident and bulls less confident, then it will power higher.
Intel and Moore's Law
Under Moore's law computing power doubles every 18 months and the value of today's computing power will be worth half as much 18 months from now. Intel and its competitors compensate by charging today's full price for the newer units.
This is a dubious business model. Ten years ago Intel was the leader in its field and its market cap was over $500 billion. Today Intel remains the leader but its market cap is $119 billion, and it reported its best quarter ever and it is upbeat about the future. If its business model is good why is its market cap not at least equal to what it was 10 years ago?
Re: FOMC Minutes: More stimulus?
Bill,
"WSJ: Federal Reserve policy makers raised the possibility at last month's rate-setting meeting that further monetary stimulus may be needed if the economy shows more serious signs of slowing, according to meeting minutes... Meanwhile, Fed officials rolled back their U.S. economic outlook for the first time in more than a year, saying a soft job market will restrain growth."
My biggest fear is that in order to "stimulate" growth and spending (and of course garner votes) we may see a bailout of state pension funds by the federal government.
Certainly seems an effective way to inject money into circulation quickly.
INTC
I don't get how one can take credit with all the INTC quotes, yet at same time proclaim to be in cash as of Friday and miss the rally this week.
Re: Intel and Moore's Law
lessmore -
"This is a dubious business model. Ten years ago Intel was the leader in its field and its market cap was over $500 billion. Today Intel remains the leader but its market cap is $119 billion, and it reported its best quarter ever and it is upbeat about the future. If its business model is good why is its market cap not at least equal to what it was 10 years ago?"
In regards to Moore's Law: In 1975, Moore extended it to 24 months and physical limitations may be reached by 2017.
I don't believe we've come close to computing power DEMAND saturation with ever increasing code, global user expansion, and the shorter economic life of a computer chip product. Intel's market cap dropped due to modest loss of it dominant market share to AMD and the pullback from the dotcom bubble hysteria, my friend.
Not so dubious a business model, really, as chips can be found in more and more products used by more and more of the global population. Just look to Apple for a spectacular rebound in market cap as the chip/computer groups mature. Why can't Intel do the same as Apple? Moreover, show me why semiconductor demand is in decline and I'll buy your thesis.
Cheers.
Can the truth set you free?
This author seems to think so:
http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/
Mid Michigan is newsworthy for a little known reason
It appears people are taking matters into their own hands:
http://www.connectmidmichigan.com/news/story.aspx?...
Re: Intel and Moore's Law
My point is that in spite of the fact that semiconductor chip demand has increased the market value of companies like Intel that produce such chips is in decline. There is a disconnect reflected in increasing chip demand and decreasing company value. Apple is the exception. I doubt that Intel can start aggressively charging for its chips and claim the chips are no longer just commodities. Perhaps Intel could start calling its chips I-chips (smile).
I am not presenting a thesis. I have stated a fact. Intel is selling more chips than ever while the market value of the company continues to decline. There is a disconnect.
Re: Intel and Moore's Law
I think it does require explanation why INTC's market cap has shrunk by a factor of four. I think I first read about this in a Peter Lynch book - the transition from growth stock to slow grower is very hard on stock price multiples. Several technology stocks went through that transition at the end of the dotcom boom. MSFT, CSCO, and INTC all went from PE ratios of 30-50 and massive yearly growth rates to dividend-paying, PE 13-15 stocks. Because of multiple collapse, prices never recovered to the dotcom glory days even though revenues are similar if not higher.
Ultimately, it was the realization that instead of being driven by the massive yearly growth in customer base, these companies would be driven by the replacement cycle because at some point, everyone in the world that wanted their product already had one. It was the *success* of their business model, not the failure, that ultimately caused the problem. This has happened with any new invention. It will eventually happen with the smartphone/Apple as well. Once they start paying a dividend, you know the days of the high P/E ratio are over.
Look at MSFT. In 2000, revenues 22B, PE 70. Now, revenues 58B, PE 13. Stock price went from 60 to 20. It's trading at lower multiples than PG, MMM - it's almost a utility now! INTC revs are basically unchanged from 2000, but the multiple has declined from 50 to 20 (10, if you look at forward PE) - stock price went from 80 to 20. It took a bigger beating because it didn't manage to grow revenues the way MSFT did.
So is INTC a buy? Is the PE compression cycle over? I think 10 years later, it probably is. Probably for MSFT too, although I honestly don't like their product - which is another matter entirely.
Re: NFIB SURVEY FALLS
To paraphrase "confidence is directly related to the level of the S&P average. The NFIB survey was higher 3 months ago because the market was higher. The decline in confidence recently is a direct result of the decline in the markets."
I asked Sanjay who owns the local Tiger Mart (Exxon gas and convenience store) across from Mitchel's feed and western wear here in Union Valley if the 15% fluxuation in the S&P had any influence on his decision to hire another employee. His answer was profound! "Say What?"
Re: Mid Michigan is newsworthy for a little known reason
gforce,
In addition to competing currencies, the barter system is alive and well! Locally a very organized barter network allows people to trade goods and services. People post their offers and wants in the network. Many an enterprenuer will accept massages, dental work, auto repairs or home cooked meals for their own goods and services. It's based on an hour per hour or value as agreed. HAAAA to the Fed!
the euro
I'm guessing that Bill is basing part of his current market bullish prediction on the continued move up in the euro. Watching it overnight in asia, it does seem like right now it's the little engine that could.
It's amazing just how odd market psychology is. One day the world is ending, next stop: euro parity with the dollar, talk of the PIGS all defaulting as if it was inevitable, and predictions from some quarters of the entire euro region dissolving. A month later, the euro is up 8 points and looking like there's plenty more gas in the tank.
Wasn't there a debt crisis a while back? Or was it all a dream?
FD: Still long euro
Re: Intel and Moore's Law
Thanks for your analysis. Its very good.
Re: INTC kangaroo tail reversal
up 90 cents first half hour, down 14 cents in last hour on record earnings.
Re: Can the truth set you free?
gforce,
Several interesting and believable points. Why they may be so is a more complex issue than meets the eye.
Why do so few Americans vote? Well, perhaps they are just a little quicker than I. I've voted in every primary and major election since I came of age. My first vote was cast for Nixon over Kennedy. With only a few exceptions (John B. Anderson, Ross Perot) since then I have voted not for, but against who I believed to be the worse candidate. This spring I didn't bother to vote — I wanted none of the above and didn't want the deep sense of regret I have for having voted FOR Obama.
Anderson got my vote in 1980 due to his plan to charge $0.50/gal. to develop alternative energy sources. Nothing was ever done to wean us away and now we have the BP mess and $3 to $4/gal. gas.
Now that a large number of individuals have protested enough to acquire a group name "Tea Party" they are being painted as racist by everyone form D.C. to NAACP and a bunch of others to boot.
I expect things to get far worse before enough people rebel and real change can be forced through. (Not just a meaningless "Hope", "Believe In" or other verbal vomit.)
With this kind of "official truth" being fed to us I feel like I'm in 1930s Germany.
http://tiny.cc/zzgzr
Three Million Imaginary Jobs
The White House says the stimulus worked beyond even its hopes. Seriously.
Re: Intel and Moore's Law
I have no way of knowing if this has happened with INTEL's products, but...
In 1993 I needed to upgrade memory at a cost of $445.50/MB.
In 2003 it cost me $0.26/MB.
In 2009 in cost $0.03785/MB.
Re: Mid Michigan is newsworthy for a little known reason
Loannetter,
Same here in Illinois.
Just as it was in the Soviet Union when my son's high school class visited in 1980. Levis were a preferred currency as were Elvis records and US news magazines like TIME and News Week.
The "real market" eventually trumps government pretense.
Re: INTC
London,
If you're referring to me, you are misstating the case. In the blog I referred to INTC as a good long-term situation as well as a very short-term one to be bought on market weakness. The impressive quarter caused some traders to chase the stock, which I advised against, and in a couple hours the stock dropped back about -3 or -4%. As for being about 70 - 80% in cash at the close Friday, I returned on Monday -- after a restful weekend.
But maybe you were not referring to me. I don't know because I don't spend much time reading the blog these days.