Skip to Content

Cara's Commentary & Community Chat, Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2009

[10:10am ET] The world is watching the US Congress and Administration very closely as to what many see are heavy handed strategies and tactics with respect to imposition of US jurisdictional control over international business and financial matters. Maybe these policies worked 20-40-60 years ago, but today they are seen as annoyances, and probably contrary to international treaties like WTO that the US has signed. I’m speaking today about the Barney Frank vision about global banks operating the US way everywhere or taking the highway out of America.

http://tinyurl.com/nzqmh3

In this regard, Barney Frank is becoming the Ugly American.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ugly_American

On another matter, I am concerned that too many people are reading so-called “investment” letters that purport to know that the US Dollar is about to crash. To the contrary, I believe that the recent dip below 79 will probably recover the 79 rate and, should global equity prices begin to slide, the $USD could even regain 81 or higher. That’s still not a strong Dollar, but it would be sufficient to hurt traders who are short the Dollar and long commodity prices, including oil, metals and precious metals.

My view for some time has been that there would be higher equity prices on account of the fact that banks need re-financing, and they are likely to help out their position by promoting the various stock sectors as high as possible. During this time, the Fed has helped by keeping interest rates low despite a tax shortfall and a President who was elected on the promise to cut, not raise, taxes.

That softness on the Dollar has pushed commodity prices and equity prices very high. Global equity prices have been led higher by international markets like China, Russia, India, Brazil, Indonesia, Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong. In a market pull-back, these markets are usually the leaders on the downside as well, which means that money flows back into US Dollars. As the Dollar strengthens, commodity prices also come under pressure; this becomes a self-fulfilling matter, pushing the Dollar even higher.

With regard to the US Dollar, there will be a G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh on September 24 and 25. The agenda is usually worked out well before that. So, for the next month, I do believe there is a very low probability of a major change in the $USD. I also think there is a better than 50% probability that with consumer spending falling, as seen today with Procter & Gamble and recently with Target, that the US Retailers will pull the S&P back down to test the support at around 950. That kind of move ought to put a floor under the $USD and even give it a boost for a couple weeks.

In mid to late September or early October, I believe there will be a bigger move in equities to the downside, which would put even more pressure for a higher $USD.

Interest rates in the US might also start to rise at this time in order to attract foreign investment for the huge Treasury funds that are required, and that could push the Dollar higher.

Nobody knows of course, but the point is that, based on multiple factors, I believe the $USD will not fall much further here, and is more than likely to hold its ground and gradually move higher. Timing is everything; we are re-evaluating our heavy precious metals position.


Bookmark and Share

Comments

Buffett’s Betrayal-Reuters

Warren at the public trough...........
http://tinyurl.com/nj2xna

Barney Frank

Went from being basically a national joke 20 years ago to one of the most powerful people in the country. Really it's an amazing story of a gay guy going all the way to the top of his field. Shows you what you can accomplish when you don't have a wife hectoring you to mow the lawn all the time:)

So what exactly is the catalyst for this selloff?

TBT

Today's action is why I have a hard time staying long TBT in what I consider a very over bought market. What am I missing??

Sold QID @ 26.62.

open new position..

rxii..

alright

went long a little yamana just to be a contrarian about it...in the 940's.

Re: Barney Frank

Shark,

Actually, it shows that "a gay guy" is no more likely to be moral or ethical when it comes to wielding power than anyone else. Barney's former live-in lover, a Fanny Mae exec, got a great deal when Barney allowed him and others to change their pay method to a percentage of loans issued. The limit for a loan went to $400,000 and then it became a "right" for anyone to own a home whether he was a good risk or not,

Barney dodged criticism on this issue by responding if he had had the power he would have gotten us out of Iraq — not to slick, but it works these days. He has gotten a pass on his conflict of love interest.

The question is if he had been straight would he have been nailed like most others in Congress?

Either way — he's a liability to taxpayers and as crooked as any of these bastards in D.C.

Remember yesterday's play?

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=NVAX&p=1&yr=0&mn=...

spitting in my eye. Unable to reenter the trade due to capital restrictions, I can only watch in helpless rage as NVAX mocks me today.

Off to meet the family at the pool.

Cheers.

Like a pot of boiling water.....

It will keep boiling, but slowly evaporate...NEVER go long on ' if '....To me, the past 3 weeks have been just that...

Re: TBT

Mark,

It is time for the Treasuries to get a bit of support here before the next auction — TBT has not been doing all that great since I sold my last long bunch 7-17. I am still holding the TLT I bought at the same time expecting the equity sell-off to be a time to institute more cries for safe havens.

This is just part of the current Fed game plan, IMO.

How long they can milk it is an open question.

USD not down for the count

contrarian to the contrarians,

i agree wholeheartedly with bill this morning, people have been calling for a crash in the USD for years, it hasnt happened, and clearly wont be happening anytime soon.

people point to some arbitrary low for the past few months as if it means anything.

they cite budget and gdp numbers, and tax revenues as if it means anything, when forget that the value of the USD is in comparison to other nations who are struggling just as much, who are printing and running deficits just as high.

the difference being that the USD remains the reserve currency, while say russia or brazil, former 3rd world nations who have defaulted in their debt the past 20 years do not enjoy such privilige understandably. so remember that all the talk of how dire things are in the US which would hurt the dollar are propaganda and lies. the very nations who repeat such nonsense continue to purchase billions in US debt. yes they have slowed somewhat, but it doesnt seem to have hurt the dollar as it hasnt fallen below the lows of 2007/2008, despite all the QE...

think about it next time we hear another story about a chinese official expressing "concern" about US debt.

gold is as i have opined before giving us one giant head fake as the newsletter writers line up to shout "get on board before its too late", i have no worries that we will have plenty time to buy at much lower prices, and at best sell some should we kiss the $990-1010 region before the crunch down. especially in the miners which will get hit harder on the way down.

volume on the miners, the canary on the mine is still lacking force to suggest an explosion. be careful.

AIG

looking very strong now. big volume, nice move up.

FD:
long stock and ITM calls.

Market Could Crash ths Fall...

5 Reasons the Market Could Crash ths Fall-"13Mill Americans Exhaust Unemployment by 12/09" http://bit.ly/1rM2Zq

Re: AIG

Nicely played, man.

Perhaps the ' boys ' will take the flu hypes downward for

a few.... CDC has reverted to a ' weekly update ' instead of when receiving reports.... I would suspect the 'weekly ' will be Saturdays or Mondays... I do know this.. In Greensboro, NC, the wife( an R.N. ) of a friend, was called back from vacation this past weekend, to help with a ' situation ' ( my choice of wording )that has developed at a daycare....

FAZ 29.12/ SRS 13.15

...

Business roundup in Alabama...

Wednesday, August 05, 2009

New South loses $55.4 million

Birmingham's New South Federal Savings Bank reported a second-quarter loss of $55.4 million as it beefed up reserves to cover bad loans and values of foreclosed properties dropped.

New South, which is operating under agreements with regulators to improve performance, said it disposed of a "significant amount" of bad loans in the quarter and sold half of its auto-loan portfolio

"We have been very aggressive in addressing non-performing assets, meaning we get them off our books as rapidly as possible," Chairman Will Ratliff said in a statement.

New South has hired Birmingham investment banking firm Sterne, Agee & Leach to help raise additional capital and indentify other options.

Vulcan Materials profit drops

Vulcan Materials Co., a major producer of crushed stone used in construction projects, said second-quarter profit fell 84 percent as the housing recession reduced demand for its products.

Net income dropped to $22.2 million, or 20 cents per share, from $140.8 million, or $1.27 per share, a year earlier, Birmingham-based Vulcan said.

Sales in the period declined 29 percent to $721.9 million.

"We remain focused on managing costs and generating cash, which will enhance our ability to increase earnings as the economy recovers and construction activity improves," CEO Don James said in a statement.

Protective Life adds director

Protective Life Corp. named Hans Miller to join the Birmingham-based insurer's board of directors.

Miller formerly was managing director and senior adviser with the investment bank of Bank of America Corp. He also was president and CEO of Hartford International Financial Services Group.

HealthSouth posts loss

HealthSouth Corp. had a second-quarter loss, after taking a non-cash charge to account for changes in the value of company stock held for distribution to shareholders who are part of a class-action settlement.

The Birmingham-based company said the net loss was 14 cents a share, or $12 million, down from net income of $37.6 million, or 47 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenue rose 6 percent to $483.7 million.

The non-cash charge of $48.6 million reflected the increased value of company shares that eventually will be distributed to shareholders who settled their litigation with the company over its accounting fraud.

Excluding the charge, earnings per share were 39 cents.

Alabama Aircraft reports profit

Alabama Aircraft Industries, employer of about 600 people in Birmingham, said Tuesday it had a profit in the second quarter.

Net income was $800,000, or 19 cents a share, compared to a loss of $2.4 million, or 59 cents a share, a year earlier. Sales at the military aircraft maintenance company rose 38 percent to $17.3 million.

CEO Ron Aramini said the company is competing for contracts to maintain C-130 transport planes. He said profit has been solid on KC-135 tanker and P-3 maritime patrol plane contracts.

ProAssurance boosts profit

Birmingham-based ProAssurance Corp. said Tuesday second-quarter profit rose 24 percent. The malpractice insurer said net income was $53.8 million, or $1.62 a share, compared to $43.3 million, or $1.27 a share, a year earlier.

Operating income, which excludes gains and losses from investments, rose 8 percent to $50.3 million, or $1.52 a share.

Re: AIG

Yes, teamonfuego. Nicely done!

Cara 100 Update (Final)

CTSH - Upgraded at Goldman to Buy from Neutral. The co. is poised for growth after enduring the economic downturn with a potential catalyst being improvements in application development spending. This signals that packaged application declines are likely bottoming, with some signs showing that we could see YOY growth in the 4Q of 2009. Estimates raised for FY09 to $1.67 from $1.53. Increased target price to $39 from $24

FSLR - numbers reduced at Merrill/BofA through 2010. Rebate will have a temporary pressure ion margins. Buy rating and $180 price target.

INTC - FY09 estimates raised at Goldman to $0.96 from $0.93 as gross margins could hit 60%. Key takeaways from the company include diminishing volatility in orders, inventories are low, and that fundamentals in the PC supply chain are improving. Maintained Neutral rating.

WFMI - Upgraded at Morgan Stanley. Rating raised to Equal-weight from Underweight. Eliminates $15 price target. 2009 EPS estimates raised to $0.92 from $0.80.

WFMI - target raised at Goldman to $25 from $19. The co. has seen a bottom in its comps sales and is driving surprising margin expansion via intense cost control. Estimates raised for FY09 to $0.89 from $0.77. Maintained Neutral rating.

Re: AIG

Sold half my ITM calls at $4.45 that I bought at $1.25ish. Keeping the rest probably through the earnings call on Friday.

Re: Market Could Crash ths Fall...

This is just an opinion: buyer be ware!

1. The HB&B have raised sufficient capital or are close to this goal.

2. We are climbing a wall of worry.

3. Bill has remarked in the past that at times prices do what prices do regardless of the fundamentals or there abouts.

Any discussion, angst, or other elucidation welcome.

Re: Business roundup in Alabama...

Speaking of Alabama . . . . previously posted caution on the Jefferson County muni bonds down there. . . last I heard was possible bankruptcy (see link) . . . last weekend (Monday edition) saw IBD paragraph stating Jeff Cty was closer to bankruptcy.

Any more up to date information?

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7010596486

AIG

sold 2/3 of my OTM options at $.90 that I bought at $.15.

Is China signaling that they expect inflation to rise[?]

-The U.S. Treasury Department indicated that they plan to ramp up sales of inflation-protected bonds, known as TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities).

-The Wall Street Journal said the action is being initiated to "help fund the nation's growing budget deficit". Could this be a signal that the gov. and fed. are opting to go for "printing more money" to keep the economy (and government) going, and thereby fueling inflation down the road?

-Apparently, Chinese officials have specifically said that they will buy more U.S. Bonds, but wanted to favor buying TIPS.

http://www.stocktiming.com/Wednesday-DailyMarketUp...

POMO

[see attached chart]
".....I however took the liberty to highlight and mark each day a POMO operation was held. Quoting the article:

[Permanent Open Market Operations] are conducted from about 10:30am to 11:00am on pre-announced days. In such auctions, the FRNY permanently purchases Treasury securities from selected dealers, with the total purchase amount for a day ranging from about $1.5 B to $7.5B. These days are highly correlated with paint-the-tape closes, with the theory being that the large institutions that receive capital injections are able to leverage this money by 100 to 500 times and then use it to ramp equities.

.....there was a POMO auction this morning and roughly $7.3 Billion were accepted. If you leverage that 100 x you’ve got some real cash to move either treasuries or equities with."

[From "molecool" options trader]

~~~~~~
So if this theory holds up we could see a nice move to the upside either late today or tomorrow.

AttachmentSize
2009-08-04_pomo.png 212.57 KB

Bullish wedge: RBY

...

...

Re: Business roundup in Alabama...

Interesting facts, firefly,

Just to clarify looks like this was published by the Birmingham News

Link to URL
http://www.al.com/business/birminghamnews/briefrou...

UAUA

Rocking again today. Still long but sold some Dec 7 calls on a portion of the positon.

Jesse - looks like you may be able to get that ski pass for this season instead of next!

ATRI: Atrion

Tiny micro cap: less than 2 mil. shares outstanding and thinly traded.

It is a niche mfr. of medical products/devices, and it just announced earnings +12% and sales +7% in most recent quarter, which is not bad given the cost cutting most industries have endured given the current economic weakness.

The company just raised the quarterly dividend 20%, so it now yields 1.1% at the current price ($132). It also has over $10/share in cash and no debt.

It reminds me of a company I purchased back in the early 1990s (but subsequently sold way too soon): (TECH) Techne

Look at how TECH has performed over the past 20 years; and it likely still has growth ahead.

http://www.google.com/finance?client=news&q=tech

Re: POMO

Bev:

Got to love it...climbing that wall...prices have a story to tell. This fits with my opinion on capital raising; how banks will raise more capital into the fall. What do you think about the capital raising regarding Banks and others, this has been a mainstay recently?

Did nicely on my Yamana

Not like you pirates with that AIG......Still not setting alerts right but did add a few sheckles to the coffers.

AIG

sold out of all of my calls except a few out of the money calls ($20 strike expires August) in case earnings are crazy on friday.

WOW what a move today.

Did Cramer get it right?

He called it a bull market a month ago. As opposed to a bear market rally. I'm finding it hard to argue with that.

I can feel the short squeeze

It's merciless. Anyone who's held unhedged positions for the past three weeks- I'd hate to have to try breaking him down in an interrogation room.

Banks raising capital?

I think Bill's thesis is playing out right now.

Re: POMO

Another great chart from Bev, thanks! Let's see if they'll waste more money pumping the same market they abandoned earlier this year and last....

Bev - Didn't they do the same POMO-pump thing back in early March?

First 5 months of Obama Administration

This is pretty funny, or not..........
First 5 months of Obama Administration

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have shrugged it off?

Had George W. Bush given English Prime Minister Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs in exchange for a thoughtful and historic gift from Mr. Brown, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had gifted the Queen of England with an iPod containing videos of his own speeches, would you not have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have been incensed?

Were George W. Bush to have visited Austria and made an inane reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as an insignificant slip?

If George W. Bush had staffed his cabinet and circle of top advisers with persons who cannot or do not keep current on their income taxes (TAX CHEATS) would you have been OK with that?

If George W. Bush had been so unbelievably ignorant of Mexican history and the Spanish language as to clumsily and nonsensically refer to "Cinco de Mayo" (Fifth of May) as “cinco de quatro” (fifth of four) in the presence of the Mexican Ambassador, and continue to flub it when trying to recover from the gaffe, would you have merely winced in embarrassment and shrugged it off?

Had George W. Bush misspelled the word "advice", would you have hammered him incessantly as was Dan Quayle for spelling "potato" "potatoe", and cite this as proof he's a dunce?

Had George W. Bush burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel (major carbon footprint here) to go on a Midwestern photo-op and plant a single tree on “Earth Day”, would you have thought this as hypocritical? If the Bush administration had OK'd Air Force One with fighter escort flying low and unannounced over millions of people in downtown Manhattan creating widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they were clueless over the disaster of 9-11?

Had George W. Bush been the first President to need a teleprompter to get through a press conference, would you have seen this as proof of what a complete idiot he is? And would you also suspect his words were "ingenuine" and were actually those of someone behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief to flood victims in the Midwest where more people were killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you have fashioned it into an ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush, in an unprecedented government intrusion into the private sector and completely without the constitutional authority to do so, dared to "fire" the CEO of a corporation, would you have ac quiesced?

Had George W. Bush in his first year proposed to double a national debt which had taken more than two centuries--200 years to accumulate--would you have agreed of this absurd legislation?

And if George W. Bush then proposed to double the debt again in a few years, would you have questioned the wisdom of such a course of action?

If George W. Bush had degraded your own retirement plan by 90% as in the holdings in GM stock, and at the same time given the UAW a majority stake in GM, effectively giving ownership over to the Union, would you have accepted that?

If George W. Bush, after telling Americans "it is time to sacrifice," and then spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to fly First Lady Laura Bush to New York City for dinner and a Broadway play on the taxpayers' dime, would you have called this behavior hypocritical?

So, tell me again, what actions have set President Obama above other leaders and do you consider the above as evidence of his brilliance, competence, diplomacy, and leadership?

Can't think of anything? No worries--Obama has done all the above in his first five months--so you have three years and seven months to come up with something else.

Re: UAUA

I keep hoping, it's got to happen by 9/30 to get the early bird special.:) This trade has been educational. Selling the 2011 put when the price was about $3.50 (for $1.25) now has the put worth about $1.10, so I am up $150. If instead I had bought $1250 worth of the common I would probably be up about $700 (close to the season pass price) and would definitely be looking good for this winter. It is an interesting example to me of how risk is related to reward when trading the market. Looking back, I wish I had used the $1250 from the sale of the puts to buy some shares of common, then I would be covered for 2 ski seasons. I have used that strategy before with stocks I was more bullish on (GG) and that worked out well. The education continues, but I'm making progress, thanks to Bill and so many others here.

Glad to hear your kicking ass on this trade, very well done on your part!

Re: Market Could Crash ths Fall...

FireFly,

This spring I read that programed trading went from 27% a year ago to 41%. Would this be a part of that or in addition? Has it gone from 41% to 70% in the past few months?

Re: First 5 months of Obama Administration

And I was hoping the NYC Wall Street flyover was a military warning to HB&B, similar to gunships showing up in the gulf of some middle eastern country. Instead it appears to have been a welcoming flyover?

Re: Did Cramer get it right?

Short answer = no.

Re: POMO

ALOHA !!

So while POMO is pumping and dumping the equities the SUPER TALF is going to inflate up $1TRIL USD to revive the various credit markets. How do you get $1TRIL USD of loans? Here ...

"The Consumer & Business Lending Initiative (Super TALF) will support the purchase of loans by providing the financing to private investors to help unfreeze and lower interest rates for auto, small business, credit card and other consumer and business credit. Previously, Treasury was to use $20 billion to leverage $200 billion of lending from the Federal Reserve. The Financial Stability Plan will dramatically increase the size by using $100 billion to leverage up to $1 trillion and kick start lending by focusing on new loans."

So if you thought $7.5BIL was a lot wait until you see what $100BIL will do for equities.

So this part of the FINSOB is yet another backdoor BAILOUT for banks. The front door BAILOUT was the FASB accounting rules that turned losses into profits and ran the bank stocks share price up so they could fund their way to bonus freedom. SUPER TALF is designed to pick up where the FASB left off!

How is it that banks get away with murder? WE ALLOW IT because we voted for it!

I might add that none of the above is STRONG DOLLAR POLICY ...

I don't get it

"ALBANY, N.Y. — Eli Manning has agreed to a new six-year, $97 million contract extension with the New York Giants that will make him the highest paid player in the NFL with an average salary of roughly $15.3 million."

Sports salaries utterly confound every principle of economic theory...such as, the erroneous notion that all-union workforces cannot be super-efficient profits-wise, and that employees can't enjoy a de-facto if temporary ownership stake in the overall entity. When I was a kid a starting pitcher would make well under 100 grand a year. Carl Pavano got 40 million over 4 years from the Yankees. And the best seats are now $1200 bucks. See a connection here?

Fans of pro sports are the clear losers in the zero sum game of player's rights and union salary demands.

What I'd love to read is a cool, scholarly dissertation on exactly why and how pro sports is the endeavor most succeptible to successful unionization efforts. It kind of flies in the face of the notion of the rugged individual with individual marketable skills and his ability to bargain for himself, meaning if a 40 home run hitter needs a union and an agent then maybe all of us do too.

Re: POMO

TN_blogger

That is amazing the banks can do that and succeed. Looks like you and Mr Cara have like minds. To me it make sense and it's ashamed they will get away with it. I have no financial stocks holdings and refuse to play that sector.

RSI sell signal

I really enjoyed Bill’s explanation of using RSI in this past weekend WIR. I am trying to apply the concept using the daily and the weekly timeframes on SLW. Looking at the weekly RSI7 which is currently about 66 and rising it appears there still is room to the upside before a sell signal. However, in the daily timeframe it seems possible to me we could get a sell signal followed by another buy signal before it “catches” up with the weekly to issue a longer term sell signal. So today I was watching the RSI7 in the daily timeframe and during the early morning sell off the RSI got down as low as 67, but has since come all the way back up to about 76. I am wondering when a sell signal of the RSI7 crossing from above 70 to below is actually triggered. I am guessing it would be the closing value, but if that is the case there must be times when the signal is quite late. As an example I am thinking about GDX last week and how quickly it fell below 70. In the case of SLW, had the price continued to decline throughout the day I am sure that by the close the RSI would be well below 70. I am guessing it is best to watch some other things to help decide whether to act on an intraday signal.

Just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on how to use the RSI7 daily as a sell signal and if it is used in conjunction with some other indicators. Any ideas are appreciated.

A Grand Unified Theory of Market Manipulation

http://tinyurl.com/kudyuf

Extracted from this recent post at Evil Speculator

http://tinyurl.com/nqfprp

Re: FAZ 29.12/ SRS 13.15>> Off 28.23/ 12.96

Small positions, of course. But they gave me a good take on market winds. I think we go higher.

Re: First 5 months of Obama Administration

You are right, Bush was the greatest, if we politely ignore his refusal to heed the warnings that "Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in the United States", or the fantasy WMDs that got us into the Iraq war on credit.
Haliburton? Fisa wiretap violations, torture, "disappearing" of persons around the globe, all the standard third world military dictator stuff.
Oh yeah, the near total destruction of the U. S. economy. Jury is still out on that one....
But offending the queen, and going to New York....why that is too much!

Keep up the good work.

Re: AIG

That's things like the Eveready bunny. What's their plan? To pay off the federal debt today? :P

Re: First 5 months of Obama Administration

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have shrugged it off?

He was IN the special olympics.

Had George W. Bush given English Prime Minister Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs in exchange for a thoughtful and historic gift from Mr. Brown, would you have approved?

He gave us yellow cake.

If George W. Bush had gifted the Queen of England with an iPod containing videos of his own speeches, would you not have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

You mean like declaring for the world, "I'm the decider?"

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have been incensed?

No. He sent Dick Cheney to kiss his ass. A bow and a kiss.

Were George W. Bush to have visited Austria and made an inane reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as an insignificant slip?

did Bush know there was a country named Austria? He had never been to Europe before his Presidency.

If George W. Bush had staffed his cabinet and circle of top advisers with persons who cannot or do not keep current on their income taxes (TAX CHEATS) would you have been OK with that?

You don't know he didn't. He staffed it with right wing Christian whackos who ran the government. What's the dif?

If George W. Bush had been so unbelievably ignorant of Mexican history and the Spanish language as to clumsily and nonsensically refer to "Cinco de Mayo" (Fifth of May) as “cinco de quatro” (fifth of four) in the presence of the Mexican Ambassador, and continue to flub it when trying to recover from the gaffe, would you have merely winced in embarrassment and shrugged it off?

Gotta give it to George, he speaks spanish. Can't speak a word of Creole though.

Had George W. Bush misspelled the word "advice", would you have hammered him incessantly as was Dan Quayle for spelling "potato" "potatoe", and cite this as proof he's a dunce?

I'm gonna have to ask my strategeryist.

Had George W. Bush burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel (major carbon footprint here) to go on a Midwestern photo-op and plant a single tree on “Earth Day”, would you have thought this as hypocritical? If the Bush administration had OK'd Air Force One with fighter escort flying low and unannounced over millions of people in downtown Manhattan creating widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they were clueless over the disaster of 9-11?

Nah, he blew way more than that flying OVER New Orleans on his window tour.

Had George W. Bush been the first President to need a teleprompter to get through a press conference, would you have seen this as proof of what a complete idiot he is? And would you also suspect his words were "ingenuine" and were actually those of someone behind the scenes?

I WISH he had used a teleprompter and used speeches written by someone with a command of his native tongue.

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief to flood victims in the Midwest where more people were killed or made homeless than in New Orleans, would you have fashioned it into an ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

I thought I saw sandbagging, helicopters, evacuations, FEMA on the ground, but I might have been watching BBC.

If George W. Bush, in an unprecedented government intrusion into the private sector and completely without the constitutional authority to do so, dared to "fire" the CEO of a corporation, would you have ac quiesced?

Please see "Patriot Act".

Had George W. Bush in his first year proposed to double a national debt which had taken more than two centuries--200 years to accumulate--would you have agreed of this absurd legislation?

See this: http://costofwar.com/ Bush is still spending.

And if George W. Bush then proposed to double the debt again in a few years, would you have questioned the wisdom of such a course of action?

See link above.

If George W. Bush had degraded your own retirement plan by 90% as in the holdings in GM stock, and at the same time given the UAW a majority stake in GM, effectively giving ownership over to the Union, would you have accepted that?

What was the $USD worth when Bush left office? WHEN did we hit 666? You need a calendar. Edit: I correct myself here. We only hit 741 in November.
We hit 666 in March, two months into Obama's admin. Boy he had to be one powerful dude to make that happen in two months though. If you get us in a death spiral and I take the wheel, don't blame me for the death spiral.
And if we run to S&P 1005, does Obama get the credit?

If George W. Bush, after telling Americans "it is time to sacrifice," and then spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to fly First Lady Laura Bush to New York City for dinner and a Broadway play on the taxpayers' dime, would you have called this behavior hypocritical?

No. He spent WAY more vacationing and cutting brush in Crawford.

So, tell me again, what actions have set President Obama above other leaders and do you consider the above as evidence of his brilliance, competence, diplomacy, and leadership?

None really, but I'm not being selective in my memory.

CSCO after the close

Potential market mover.

Re: First 5 months of Obama Administration

ZedII - Oh but wasn't the concept of obliterating entire cities in Iraq from overhead with our priceless bombers but one of the very best ideas to have come from a presidency in eons? We made so damn many friends with that stunt it's impossible to conceive...

!dehsilpmoccA noissiM

Re: POMO

Chickenpookie

The chart was made by an option trader I follow name molecool. I will try to find out where he got the data and update the chart back to March. But when you look at what he has so far, it sure looks like they pump it up on those days.

I am going through last night's posts and saw your 2 charts. Are you playing the oil sector these days?

Re: POMO

Bev - "Are you playing the oil sector these days?"

Yepper, I SCOoped up some 2x short crude a couple days ago while waiting to reload gold... We'll see.

Re: POMO

Bev:

I know the financials are in the picture, but like yourself I cannot stomach rewarding them with my money, alas it may not matter in the bigger picture, or supporting their less than admirable behavior. Besides, they are so manipulated that price discovery is an afterthought with them.

I reasoned I would take the summer off. However, I tend to think plenty about the market...more than I should at this time.

The good news for America is we have some really awesome people running for congress. Rand Paul...Adam Kokesh. Both of these gentlemen possess integrity and are fiercely passionate about our constitution...something that to me is refreshing and really needed by the people who have been pillaged long enough.

Re: AIG

Heck of a day for financials.

CIT +46%.
Freddie, Fannie, Ambac, Triad, Guaranty F.G., all up +25% or more.

What does it all mean?

Re: POMO

Chickenpookie

Ever look into DTO? When it moves [5+ pts swings]and you are on the right side of the trade, it can be very profitable.

U.S.P.S. to lose 7 billion by year's end

MAYBE they ought to charge a little more for all that junk mail they keep sending me.

Re: Business roundup in Alabama...

Seamus>> it has gotten really bad down here...
"Bankrupt" Jefferson County Did Not Buy REITs Today, Summons National Guard To Maintain Order http://bit.ly/zxRHS

Guard troops may be needed in troubled Ala. county http://bit.ly/18kd7t

Long line at downtown Jefferson County courthouse http://bit.ly/P12nA

Re: POMO

TN_blogger

"I reasoned I would take the summer off. However, I tend to think plenty about the market...more than I should at this time." <---- Looking back now I wish I would of done that!

Re: AIG

I could be wrong but I vaguely remember reading someone that said usually at a top the riskiest stocks are the last ones to go up...

Flash trading again

Wednesday, August 05, 2009 2:06:29 PM

(US) SEC's Schapiro confirms evaluation of 'flash trading' and the surrounding inequity associated with the trading - CNBC interview
- Notes that the SEC is moving 'quite decidely' toward banning flash trading, but still must move through regulatory process, so can not be done instantaneously.

Re: POMO

Well, whatever you do don't stop thinking about all the possibilities that could happen; like you have been lately with the comment about leveraging earlier this day. I think intelligence is important to all mankind.

To tell you the truth, I keep CNBC on mute. This has helped me more than any one thing I have ever done for my peace of mind regarding the markets recently!

Re: AIG

teamonfuego

That is true. The end of June 2008 I noticed that a lot of the big oil stocks were going no where and oil was $145 and climbing. But these small and no name independent producers were the only ones moving. So I shorted oil big time. The only mistake I made was I cashed out the day before the July 4th holiday, was afraid to hold over the 3 day weekend. The following week and months oil tanked as the story goes.

Every man for himself

I don't know how many lurkers we have, or how many are short. Just putting this out there.

There are many traders posting on boards/blogs who, were you to believe their posts, have made a lot of money/are making a lot of money in this market. It's my opinion that the majority of them are hiding/neglecting to mention their losses, outright lying, or betting ill-advised sums of money and prices happened to go their way.

Making money, especially on the short side, is hard work. It can also be incredibly tedious. Above all, it can be incredibly gut-wrenching. If you keep position sizes small, you might reasonably expect to make a few percent a month. You don't want to be going after the occasional large payoff- I can almost guarantee you won't have the stomach for it.

At the end of the day, you're responsible for taking care of your family. Do you want to be telling them that you gambled and lost? It's not so bad telling them you're down 40% when the rest of the world is down 40%. You do not want to be telling them you're down 40% when the market is up 40%.

It's not going to help your family to know that you're targeting a 200% gain on the ultrashorts when the market finally dives later in the year (can you honestly say that you'll survive a run to DJIA 10000?) It's also not helpful to be reading posts from other shorts who encourage you to stay cool and not back down. You might have to go back to high school to remember what happened to most guys who didn't back down.

It's every man for himself. Don't get sucked into the trash talk vortex. You're not out to impress other bloggers, your goal is to keep food on the table and pay the bills. Stay alive.

Re: AIG

Hmmm...I thought Gold was the last to go up? But yah, I've heard that too. Anyway, so all Asia was red last night and all that money flowed into US banks today. I understand the profit-taking in Asia, and I understand it moving West but to the banks? Is this a bullish rotation?

Re: POMO

Bev - DTO - Yes, that one might have been preferable, reasons I chose SCO: 1) Couldn't remember DTO ticker, 2) Afterward I noticed DTO is more thinly traded (if that makes any difference).

I simply hit the OH S**T button and let 'er rip...

Re: Every man for himself

2nd - that's very true. In the past year I've learned how to tune out 90% of the talking heads and it has worked tremendously for me. A lot of what Bill has written about helps in gauging when to buy/sell stocks because as we all know its all about timing.

Re: Business roundup in Alabama...

oh yes oppsss forgot the link! Thanks Vanillabean!

Re: Market Could Crash ths Fall...

Excellent Questions Grym... I am still learning and will have to do more homework as of right off the top of my head I am not sure of the up trend...

Re: POMO

CP- Too funny. The problem for many of us is we get the comment right, but can't hit the button ;)

Re: Every man for himself

"In the past year I've learned how to tune out 90% of the talking heads and it has worked tremendously for me."

Yeah. How many TV talkers were saying for the past 2 months that we HAVE to have a correction, or even a move to new lows. Wait for those jerks to get bullish and there's your sell signal.

There are NO experts in this business, not any who ever say anything to folks like us.

Re: Every man for himself

So your saying to stop reading blogs right. Good advice. Goodbye.
Bob

SRS/FAZ>> It's over

SRS is now at 12.70, FAZ at 28.05. Basically all-time lows. What do those numbers tell you? I held both positions for a period of time today, so I think I know. It's baccarat players running out of chips and pulling their last few twenties out. Or sending their worried spouses to the ATM for another hundred. The SRS bet is over. The FAZ bet is over. The moment SRS/FAZ finally take off, they will gap up hard, and the die-hard players will be on the freeway half way home.

Re: Every man for himself

Bob- No, I'm saying to use discernment when deciding what to read, and how to respond to what you read.

Re: SRS/FAZ>> It's over

got in early today at 12.88 then got knocked out at 12.70 about 5 minutes ago. I think the only smart move I have done all summer is get in and out of SPNG at the right moments. Also glad I took almost everything off the table last month...I may have lost out on some action but at least I could sleep at night. Marriage 1 month away, with so much to do for that, no time for SRS shenanigans... wish me luck!

Re: SRS/FAZ>> It's over

good luck, I hope you have "found" what you are looking for :)

a night without the market is refreshing.

A demain.

Re: Every man for himself

Shark, please: Re "There are NO experts in this business, not any who ever say anything to folks like us", yesterday morning I wrote: "I also noted that Department store Target (TGT -1.3%) was soft, and will be watching to see if Walmart (WMT) follows suit today." I then bought the Sept 50 puts at $1.58 during the day and a day later they are $1.97 bid.

Red or Black ? [00 - GS wins]

There was a small change in Tuesday's McClellan Oscillator which in the past has been a pretty good indicator of a large price move in a day or two. When looking at today's tape and seeing how the Nasd is going I would of been leaning more to the short side, especially with all the other chart indicators being in the over bought area. But with that POMO auction today and that trend on the chart which seems to point out a possible end of day rally, it is hard to take a position either way.

On the Elliot Wave count side [BTW which there are many interpretations]some have us in 4 of (5) of {1}of C. Which basically means the next wave 5 of (5) will be UP [one last quick upwards rally].Then we start a correction wave (2)of C down [which will most likely not be too deep and short in duration]. Then wave (3) of C will begin which will be a very powerful upward move into the high 10,000 or low 11,000 area.

[As I typed this the market is rallying up. Taking out the stops or ready for the end of day pump? Like I said Red or Black?]

Re: Every man for himself

Without naming any, I'm following blogs that even today continue to (at least tacitly) encourage standing pat on short positions and/or adding new ones! I just think it would be more responsible for them to (a) admit they've been wrong up to this point, and (b) at least caution others against taking the same stance.

What's the point in being the last bear standing?

Re: Red or Black ? [00 - GS wins]

I'll take Black ;)

btw, Bev- You are a great example of someone who is able to put on the brakes when noticing she's driving the wrong way and immediately make that U-turn. It's the guys who insist on continuing down the highway that I'm trying to warn. (And we've all been there. I know I have.)

Re: Every man for himself

Not sure if I fall into this group... but for the record, I was short FXI from 43 which was covered today 41.66. I am still holding DTO [underwater..but expect oil to start to come down]. And QQQQ I covered yesterday for a small $35 loss. Tried to re short FXI earlier today but as always Scottrade had none. Woooo what a surprise that was.

Re: SRS/FAZ>> It's over

found- My wife and I will be attending a wedding reception for our neighbor's son this weekend. I agree, the last thing you need on your mind right now is SOS (I mean SRS).

Re: Every man for himself

2nd you bring up great points and the hardest part of understanding the market is grappling with ourselves. Pundits aside if the market is illogically bullish when you think otherwise either join the party and trade the direction OR be bearish and sit it out. The world is littered w/folks who were 'right' but ended up losing their hard earned cash.

Re: Red or Black ? [00 - GS wins]

just saw this 2nd.."btw, Bev- You are a great example of someone who is able to put on the brakes when noticing she's driving the wrong way and immediately make that U-turn"

Thank you but I am afraid I am not a good example. I have been like the cartoon character Mr MaGoo at times with some of my trades. But I am learning.

Did you read this 2nd? This took guts to write..

http://xtrends.blogspot.com/2009/08/lightening-doe...

Auction Alert from U.S. Department of the Treasury

A few folks were asking about Gold & PM where to buy...
Check out this site and there are 2 Auctions up coming..
http://bit.ly/EPozf

Whole Foods

WFMI beats easily beatable 65 cent E estimates by 15 cents and suddenly the stock rockets almost +20%???

This is not trading folks. People are gaming the market.

Re: Red or Black ? [00 - GS wins]

Bev- Interesting read.

The personality differences between the writer and me are huge. I would never have been able to turn 350k into 4m simply because I would never have entrusted my account to someone who bet that way. And were I to end up with 3.6m windfall, I already know I wouldn't be trading it.

Re: Red or Black ? [00 - GS wins]

Bev:

I wish all to have a good time being perpetually prepared to partake in market euphoria or at least strapped in. Will technicals and price movement rule the day as we head into the last hour or do we have enough animal spirits left to push for a positive finish? That is the question.

What if (OPEC)?

What if OPEC were to open their taps a little further, that would assist the recovery somewhat... I wonder - We haven't heard much about this from the talking heads up their arse lately have we? That would make them wrong on their calls for no recovery and it would take some downward pressure off the $USD.

I see nothing wrong with a polite gesture (bow) on the behalf of our president, it's customary in many cases and I've done it myself many times when greeting foreigners. Funny though, ducks often make an identical gesture, I guess that's where the term "duck" came from. GWB is familiar with this gesture from a defensive perspective.

From CTA trader’s conference call notes July 30, 2009

Bill wrote:

“Markets that open weak and finish higher are technically strong markets, demanding respect, regardless of our own opinions.”

Re: Whole Foods

"This is not trading folks. People are gaming the market."

It's not easy for me to identify the games and as a result I'm unable to take advantage. I'm being taken advantage of instead...

Re: Whole Foods

Chickenpookie

LOL...[I have to give several...LOL...LOL...LOL...] that was too funny but well said. I feel the same way at times.

Re: Whole Foods

CP- Stick to the real estate decision. We've found (online browsing) some very nice homes in the Sacramento 'burbs and brand new condos in the Irvine/San Diego area that seem like good investments. No one knows when the market will bottom- but then, that gives us plenty of time to research neighborhoods and prepare.

Re: Every man for himself

"Without naming any, I'm following blogs that even today continue to (at least tacitly) encourage standing pat on short positions and/or adding new ones! "

This is just incompetent and irresponsible. Any teacher worth his salt in this business teaches, among other things, HUMILITY! Check your ego at the door, be willing to admit an error, get out when wrong, never get stubborn, realize that the market is bigger than you are and is to be followed, not to be outsmarted or out-stubborned.

Sources that encourage behavior like you described, not to name any, are to be filtered out in favor of those who show market's reality as it is, without sugarcoating.

Re: Every man for himself

2nd - "Without naming any, I'm following blogs that even today continue to (at least tacitly) encourage standing pat on short positions"

It appears to me they will eventually be correct, it's just a matter of when this GS sponsored rally gets the maximum momentum to hurt the most traders.

Remember, HB&B were way out on a limb and blame the shorts for their problems. So wouldn't it be natural for HB&B to burn the shorts and but good; while using the opportunity to burn longs as well? It seems the approach is more friendly to the long side but some bad days will be coming and they're looking like a return of the dark ages (slight over exaggeration).

Concentrate on that one...

Re: Every man for himself

Exactly.

Which is why I troll them for sentiment indicators, and post here. (Not saying they're all bad. There are a number of very good blogs out there.)

real trades?

Arrow points up, it is what it is...
CHS has a strong trending chart.
GOL on a breakout.

Do your own TA/DD

Re: Every man for himself

GS? I'm going to take the high road on that one. It's usually life, and sometimes the afterlife, that balances all accounts. I try to make regular deposits into the side that counts.

Re: Every man for himself

Vadym,

So with your extensive background and knowledge of the markets...do you think the markets are being manipulated at the current time? What is your viewpoint, because in the past, it seems you have generally dismissed the inherent advantages of the of the HB&B over the little players?

Please correct me if I am mistaken.

Re: Whole Foods

2nd - "Stick to the real estate decision."

Oh I am, believe you me...!

"Did ya see that hawk after those hens? He scared 'em! That Rhode Island Red turned white, then blue. Rhode Island, red white and blue! That's a joke, son, a flag-waver! You're built too low. The fast ones go over your head. Ya got a hole in your glove. I keep pitchin' 'em and you keep missin' 'em! Ya gotta keep your eye on the ball! Eye. Ball. Eyeball! I almost had a gag, son--a joke, that is!" ;)

Long AKS

I took a small initial position in AK Steel....they are a big supplier to auto sector...play on auto plants up and running again and the C.A.R.S program lifting sales at least temporarily.

Re: Whole Foods

2nd - I'm in the San Diego area and would love to offer up some advice to you if you need it.

AIG

bought at $21.21 and sold at $21.70. as with SPNG I think I'm pressing my luck here.

IMMR

I bought more at $4.19 this morning. average is down to $4.23.

ETFC

i'm surprised that with all of the other junk stocks doing so well that ETFC is not participating.

Re: Whole Foods

tof- Thanks, I may take you up on that. I have a younger brother who lives down there also, but he's relatively new to the area.

a reminder from David Rosenberg

about how mean the stock market can be. He repeatedly observed the similarity between the current bounce in the stock market and in the economy to what was observed at the end of 2001. Here is an excerpt from his today's writing:

"Consensus forecasts are now clustered around a 3% annual rate for 3Q2009 real GDP. This is exactly what the economy did in the first quarter of 2002 under similar circumstances — a post-shock fiscal stimulus plan that was coupled with an auto sector sales gimmick and inventory rebuilding in the manufacturing sector. The hurdle, as we saw then, was a lagging consumer coming off an asset shock; the recent asset shock was three times as severe and was coupled with a collapse in credit. After that bounce to 3%+ growth in the first quarter of 2002, the economy slowed down substantially thereafter and by the end of the year, growth had vanished completely, the equity market was heading to new lows, bonds were rallying and Fed rate-hike expectations were being unwound. Note that as ISM was breaking above 50 in February of that year and hitting its peak that June, there was nary a market-sayer forecasting what was about to take hold — the mantra of sustainable recovery and a full-fledged bull market made the headlines and so what happened came as a huge surprise to the masses. [S&P rallied 20% since its low on September 20, made a double top in January and March 2002, then made a new low in October 2002 and then re-tested that low in March 2003].

In February 2002 when the ISM index pierced 50 amid visions of a sustained inventory cycle, it was right at that time that the S&P 500 began to sputter. That's the problem when all the good news — and then some — gets discounted so quickly. We still think disappointment will inevitably set in over the sustainability of an inventory re-stocking that fails to be backed up by a revival in consumer demand."

The market will most likely be just as mean this time around: the final high for this bear market rally will be made when the economic news will look MOST promising and all newspapers will be touting the fact that the recession has ended and a sustained recovery has begun (which I think is already happening now). So beware...

Re: Whole Foods

I've been here for 4 years so I have a decent understanding of the good area.

Re: Every man for himself

2nd - "GS? I'm going to take the high road on that one."

Maybe this explains your inability (for lack of a better term) to gain confidence in the ballgame.

I'm in the same boat though, I'm pretty sure it's because I can't interpret the language of HB&B's ballgame and there aren't enough around me who I can learn from.

Okay, so maybe I'm wrong, so how'd you like those WFMI earnings that just happened to beat by a "mile"? Do those numbers really deserve all the hoopla?

It's the details we get burned on time and again.

Melt Up

That phrase now deserves to be printed without the "?" at the end.

Re: Every man for himself

Well, it's what Bill's been saying. Pretty soon they will have driven everyone off the field, and they'll be playing with themselves. Oh, sorry- high road.

Re: Whole Foods

2nd - San Diego beats the pants off Sackatomatoes IMO, but it does depend on what your needs are....

Re: Every man for himself

Hammer,

I just don't think in these terms at all. I view markets in terms of readability. Either I can read the movement and exploit it, or I don't. What causes the movement is irrelevant to me. If it's manipulation - fine, my question still is: can I read it?

Theoretically, the question of what manipulation is and how it's done, whether it's possible for us retail traders to use to our advantage is interesting one. It could also be very useful in practice, as such discussion could lead to realistic ways to discover and exploit manipulation. I, however, find that it difficult to discuss in a constructive fashion because this topic tends to cause a lot of emotional flares... so I for the most part am trying to stay away from this kind of discussion. Call me pragmatic.

EOD Stats

OK... looks like we had our big correction of the rally that started from the March lows. So now it is time to get serious and get bullish! [;-)]

AttachmentSize
Aug_5_2009.jpg 74.29 KB

Re: Melt Up???

The phrase deserves multiple "?"'s on the end to signify questionability. Look where gold, oil(supply is variable) and the $USD are, examine how jobless are going to keep their homes, consider the real reasons for why equities are higher now than two months ago and consider what the treasury market is telling you (Treasuries are the market where the smart money lives) Once Treasury rates lift (convincingly), the real trend begins, anything else is speculation IMO.

This is why I read Bill's words carefully, but not literally.

Re: Every man for himself

Thanks for the explanation...

Looks like institutions are in accumulation mode

saw this charted posted a few minutes ago ...

http://tinyurl.com/lmstzn

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

ALOHA !!

What Rosenberg left out was that the USDX peaked in 2002 and started its downward plunge to 72 over the next few years time. Once again "unemployment" was a key factor for the recovery then as it will be now, except now the "unemployment" issue is four time worse. In fact unemployment is so bad now that the US government via BLS refuses to measure it in the same terms of the markets prior to 2002. If they did then we would be wondering what the hell is Obama doing when unemployment is at 21%? Where are the consumers in a jobless recovery going to come from?

America "feels" bad because it is bad ... It is amazing that our government considers hiding the real numbers as a viable strategy! In other words ... FLAT OUT LYING!

IT ALL WORKS UNTIL IT DOESN'T!

Re: Every man for himself

speaking of men...what happened to Fred C?

Re: Looks like institutions are in accumulation mode

Interesting chart. Wonder where they get the data from? Where did you find the chart?

Re: Looks like institutions are in accumulation mode

Also, if accurate, it looks like the institutions are distributing (selling) at record low levels, i.e. sellers/bears becoming scarce. Lows at end of last August and at end of December preceded significant sell offs...

TYP (3 x Tech Bear)

bought a little after hours at 15.90ish as a hedge to my long IMMR and SPY positions.

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

kaimu - We're truly blessed to have your help in keeping the variables in perspective, thank you! We've got a long way to go before we'll really know where the charade leads but I agree, it doesn't look pretty... Some problems just go away if they're ignored long enough, this problem isn't one of them and we must prepare accordingly.

Re: Every man for himself

"what happened to Fred C?"

Outstanding in his field no doubt.

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

I worked for a company that laid off the second shift whenever the sales got to a certain low point. They did this for about 10 years. Then they closed the plant, no more production, no more product, and no more good wages. This recession has lasted so long that the unemployed are falling off the unemployment rolls. I read that they only count 6 months of unemployment for unemploymented data. Even if your collecting your unemployment extension your not considered unemployed after six months. Most people figure the true unemployment is around 19%.

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

Just curious if you are still holding srs for the long term?
It just seems a bit to volitile for my style of trading.

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

Speaking of unemployment, I remember well living in the Bay Area during the Dot.Gone bubble explosion when area unemployment hit 10%, I bought real estate on margin and did extremely well while some folks unfortunately lost upwards of $100K on their homes trying to sell, this was back when the homes were only $250-$350K. Those homes are(as of a couple years ago) now easily worth $900k-$1M. Considering that turnover in the Bay Area is rather high as well, no telling how many of those homes were recently refinanced at extreme prices. A big OUCH!

But that was nothing like what we're mixed up in today, our current situation is considerably worse and nationwide/global!

Tech

So with CSCO's uninspiring earnings, that puts both them and MSFT in the same category. That's a lot of tech, no?

How can Financials zoom +3.5% when everything else is dead?

Ask Goldman Sachs.

How does GS make $100 profits a day trading the market?

http://tinyurl.com/mx3u4z

I'd say it helps to know what is going on inside government.

http://tinyurl.com/mvlfqq

Congress must stop this so-called public partnership with GS and JPM before everybody else is the loser.

Re: How can Financials zoom +3.5% when everything else is dead?

"Stocks are likely to bounce significantly from todays low "

Thank God Big Oil doesn't make those kind of profits, I guess they're not behind those same closed doors, does anybody smell a dollar bear trap?

GRMN out of this world

You know I like Garmin -- it's a Cara 100 company. The problem is that business is really soft and the financial metrics are a mess. So early today, the company reported Q2 earnings that beat easily beatable consensus estimates of $0.51, with earnings of $0.81, down from $1.19 in the 2Q2008, which was not terrific. Garmin also posted revenues of $669 million, coming in a bit ahead of consensus estimates of $657 million, but far behind the $911.7 million a year ago. Yes, sales are lousy. For the 18 analysts who follow this company and give their opinions, the company is rated at a poor 3.3 on a scale of 5.

So why did the stock rocket +24%, which was an added market cap of over $1.5 billion, on a gap opening? This market is obviously a game to many people; it's not the real world. If I see exciting earnings next quarter on top of much better revenues, then I'll change my views. As I say, I like the company, just not the economy.

It's all about the working peoples retirement savings

Record profits for GS
Record profits from JP Morgan
Record profits by BAC

On down the line, the super rip offs control the markets....retirement savings are being raped by the privileged few controllers of the free market and workers keep contributing day after day??????????
Billions upon billions of contributions are being lost every quarter to the HB&B, and the workers hands are tied by the control that HB&B has on the workers contribution to their supposed retirement accounts.
Has anyone asked where their retirement dollars are?
Chances are, your contributions to any retirement account has been spent twice over. Now... try and get your money back with out a penalty ..... just don't everyone ask at the same time! PSST......It all went for bonuses and CEO multi million dollar pay days!
You don't have any retirement account, just a piece of paper with a pie chart that says you do!
Retirement contributions are a complete joke, nothing more..nothing less!!!!!!!

NEW YORK (MarketWatch) -- Mutual-fund investors might think the fees they pay for their investments go directly to the funds in return for managing money.

Think again.

The majority of retail funds are sold through brokerages, and each brokerage firm levies a range of charges to the fund for every sale. The cost of these agreements is passed on to investors.
A hefty chunk of what investors hand over to their mutual-funds goes to the broker-dealer or fund-distribution platform. But investors don't know these details because they aren't made public.
It's not just about where your money goes: Different firms negotiate at different rates, so brokers may have a financial incentive to sell one company's fund over another -- regardless of what's best for clients.
"Investors don't understand that this is the way the fund industry works," said Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America. "They don't use the information that's available but they're also not being given the information they need in a form they can use."
While defenders of the system argue that it's reasonable for middlemen to be paid for their services, there isn't much transparency when it comes to distribution costs.
Accordingly, investors don't realize how much of their fund fees are going to intermediary firms. The fund industry contends that the structure also gives brokerage firms the upper hand in setting prices.
There's no direct rule requiring funds or brokerage firms to disclose revenue-sharing deals. Funds simply have to state that they pay for these deals, and often that's tucked away at the back of a prospectus -- which many investors don't read before they buy into a fund.
Even then, the documents don't provide details of the payments and the firms involved. The most an investor sees is that some funds charge 12b-1 fees -- a category of charge that relates to the marketing of a fund, which typically is part of payments to brokerage firms.
There does seem to be renewed efforts to make the way broker-dealers and funds do business more transparent.
Pesident Barack Obama's June White Paper on Financial Regulatory Reform proposed giving the Securities and Exchange Commission more authority to improve disclosure requirements so that investors know what they're paying for, either at or before the point of sale.
It also suggested the SEC should have the power to ban types of compensation that could encourage brokers to act against investors' interests -- such as different rates of revenue-sharing with different fund firms.
Also last month the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the nongovernmental regulator of the securities industry, suggested that brokers disclose revenue-sharing agreements with mutual-funds to their clients at the point of sale. The comment deadline for the proposal is Aug. 3.
And the SEC has its own suggestion, an idea to allow brokers to compete on price when selling mutual funds. Presently, brokers are not permitted to negotiate sales charges with funds, receiving the amount written in a fund's prospectus.
These efforts aren't the first attempts to improve disclosure or to reform how and what funds pay to brokerage firms. But some industry observers say that with so many proposals around, and sentiment in favor of regulatory reform, change may happen this time.
"There's clearly been a major shift in the SEC's view," said Mercer Bullard, assistant professor of law at University of Mississippi and founder of consumer group Fund Democracy.
Bullard said that ideally all compensation, including revenue-sharing, should be fully disclosed before investors buy into a fund, and that the figures should be comparative, showing the different agreements a broker has with fund firms. He doubts, however, that reforms will go that far.
Rper argues that the current system is broken and needs to be completely re-evaluated.
"I have no objection to a broker being compensated for selling mutual funds, but why should the mutual-fund company decide the amount?" she said.
The situation means that "funds compete to be sold rather than compete to be bought," she said -- in other words, they try to make themselves attractive to intermediaries such as brokers rather than their ultimate clients, the investor.
Low cost, but not for investors
Fees -- and fee transparency -- are an issue even with lower-cost distributors, such as Charles Schwab & Co. (SCHW) and Fidelity Investments.
Schwab's OneSource platform and the Fidelity FundsNetwork don't charge up front for fund purchases, but instead these so-called supermarkets charge the funds a fee equal to 0.4% of assets for each sale. These charges also typically pass to investors in ways that may not be entirely clear.
Some in the fund industry argue that these charges are too high, especially for smaller funds, which then lead to higher fees for investors: Two mutual-fund managers told MarketWatch that their funds' expense ratios increased 25% to 30% when they joined the Schwab platform.
But Schwab and Fidelity, in particular, are crucial to smaller funds getting better visibility, said one of the managers, who runs a fund located in the Midwest and asked not to be identified because he does business with the fund supermarkets.
Even with the hikes, the fund supermarkets get the better end of the deal, said the other manager, who oversees a fund family with about $5 billion in assets and also asked for anonymity due to relationships with the fund supermarkets.
The manager added that his business model is slightly different from many fund firms because he uses sub-advisers to run his funds.
Unlike broker-dealers, the discount platforms don't push one fund over the other, but their fees still hit investors' wallets in a way that may not be fully understood. As with brokers, there's no point-of-sale disclosure that tells investors how much of their fund fees go to the platform in a revenue sharing deal.
Schwab defends its charges, saying they cover the costs of back-office administrative work it does for fund firms.
"Mutual-funds help to defray the costs we have, such as recordkeeping, processing statements and so on," said Doug Hanson, vice president of investment management services at Schwab who oversees Schwab's third-party mutual funds platforms. "They're compensating Schwab for those efforts."
The Encompass Fund (ENCPX) is one fund facing the question of whether it should join a platform.
"You debate whether you want to do it [because of the cost], but you also know you have to do it eventually," said Malcolm Gissen, co-manager of the fund. "If we anticipate being a fund of $100 million to $200 million, we have to be on the platforms."
Encompass, which is up about 80% this year, has roughly $4 million in assets.
Gissen said that if the fund did join a platform it would "probably" have to raise its expense ratio, now at 1.45%.
"We would try to avoid that, though, and if enough money came in we'd have a better chance of avoiding it," he said. "It's a careful balance."
Schwab's Hanson said that it's up to funds to decide whether they want to pay Schwab's charges.
"Maybe we're not appropriate for everyone," he said. "But investors benefit from [using] our platform."
Investors gain access to more than 200 fund firms and thousands of mutual-funds, Hanson said. They also get services available on Schwab's Web site, a network of branch locations and other areas of customer support that are often preferable than dealing directly with a number of individual fund firms.
It's worth asking whether investors are comfortable with higher fees in return for the kinds of add-ons that Schwab provides.
For three years until November 2007, E-Trade Financial Corp. (ETFC) had a 12b-1 cash back program, where investors buying mutual-funds on its platform received half the 12b-1 fee a fund charged -- usually 0.25% of assets -- as a rebate.
E-Trade stopped the program after a lukewarm response and used the 12b-1 fees to develop and launch an online mutual-fund center and advice-based products.
"We believed that rebating fees was very important to mutual-fund customers," a company spokeswoman said. "But we discovered that they wanted other things."

More on GRMN

Despite what some writers were ecstatic about today, the business at Garmin was lousy in every product line:

Marine Unit Q2 Rev Down -15% To $60M

Aviation Unit Q2 Rev Down -28% To $64M

Outdoor/Fitness Q2 Rev Down -9% To $108M

Automotive/Mobile Q2 Rev Down -31% To $437M

Q2 Rev Down Down -27% to $669.1 million

Q2 Net Down -37%

The stock had already been up +42% for the year before today’s trades

GRMN was up +23.84% today to $33.66

Here is the killer: “Wedbush believes Garmin reported solid Q2 results, but remains cautious on the stock longer term. Despite raising its target price, the firm keeps an Underperform rating on Garmin.”

Well, I suppose if their 12-month target is up to 28 and the stock closed today at $33.66, they ought to have an Under-Perform rating.

Again, I like the company, but I don’t see how you make money buying it here.

I haven’t traded GRMN this year, but I might if it falls back -40% to $20.

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

"Just curious if you are still holding srs for the long term?"

I was accumulating SRS for the last few weeks with my last purchase being at $13.35 yesterday. Should have bought more today at the close, as it is up 2.22% after hours. But then, I decided to heed 2nd_ave's wisdom about not taking too much risk and stop adding to SRS for a while, until I see that the market is breaking down.

I view SRS as a timeless put option on a weak sector of the market. Put options can sometimes lose 90% of their value and then make a remarkable comeback during a market decline, if that decline happens before the puts expire. SRS does not expire. Those who were buying puts on the way up since July 10, (to gradually hedge their long positions) probably lost more (in percentage terms) than those who were buying SRS/SKF. Since I was treating SRS/SKF as put options, I was buying them in very small quantities, and so instead of getting upset about the losses on these purchases I keep reminding myself that my goal was to hedge my long positions, which I have successfully accomplished by stopping the growth of my portfolio only at the end of last week and keeping its total value flat (at the highest level since the October 2008 crash) until yesterday, with the total decline today being only about 0.5% (because the SRS I purchased yesterday finally tipped my portfolio to the short side).

SRS is down 46% since July 10, but it went down basically in a straight line. So if the up move in REITs is reversed and they move down in a straight line, then the straight line gains in SRS will be compounded and it will end up close to where it was on July 10.

So the key for investors (rather than day traders) for not getting burned with ultra-shorts, IMO, is to buy them in very small quantities just as one would buy put options, and buy them only to hedge long positions (i.e., to avoid a serious short bias in the whole portfolio).

Re: It's all about the working peoples retirement savings

bigwad1,

HB&B rips off the pensions and portfolios of all of us, including the people in Congress and the Administration. Did you see how much Bernanke's portfolio was crushed this year?

How this nonsense is permitted to go on is beyond me. Having once worked at Dean Witter (Morgan Stanley), I respect Goldman and JP Morgan and the rest of them for the talent and resources they have. But they are permitted by govt to operate conflicts of interest and that has to be stopped. The industry structure, rules and regulations put them into a situation where they never take the risks that you and I must take, and that's not fair. That, in a nutshell, is my complaint.

Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

It seems as if I've made a comment about cutting losses quickly every day for the past month. And I'm newly amazed every morning how effective that rule is.

I went back over my short entries and exits for the past 3 1/2 weeks.

I jumped in nine times trying to time a market reversal. The position sizes were quite small. I exited for the most part with 3 figure losses, which given the small position sizes were still significant percentage hits in some cases. Overall, I'm down -2700, which translates into an average loss of 300/day for the nine days I played counter-trend.

If I had held on to the original positions and continued to add on weakness, I'm guessing I would be down in the mid-5 figures.

If I had taken the kinds of position sizes some of the bloggers I follow are claiming to have taken (they were more willing to reveal position sizes earlier in the rally, and with a few exceptions I haven't seen many positions closed), my losses would undoubtedly be in 6 figures.

To make it simple, let's say my losses under the three different scenarios work out to -2700, -27000, and -270000, which are actually quite realistic numbers. (Some bloggers are trading position sizes in 7 figures.)

Let's see. I'm a little unhappy with -2700, but my family can live with that. At -27000, I'd be telling the wife, but would probably spare the kids. At -270000, I'd be at the bar- and I might as well have run my confidence through a micro-shredder, as it would be almost impossible to piece it back together.

Cutting losses quickly- it's like strapping on the life vest before you push off in the kayak, or learning defensive tactics before you start driving solo. If you don't, you may never do it again.

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

2nd, David- Both of your last posts were very helpful reads for me.

My question...Will I ever have the confidence to be fully invested again? I suspect so, but right now I can't envision the scenario. My goal the past few months have been to take profits quickly. I've left a lot on the table, and have been spared some give-backs. So I would say it's been about even. I know this isn't the best way to play the market over a long period of time, but my portfolio is inching higher.

My last 2 trades, QID and ERY are now both above my exit price. If this is the start of a pull back, will I be able to re-enter at a higher price? Humm...

CP- Can I have a beer now?

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

2nd - (assuming it helps) my largest positions are typically four figures for each trade leg and I legged into a short crude position a couple sessions ago now underwater by $28(0.59%) + what it would take me to get out before close and ahead $42(0.8%) AH + exit fee....

At one point today I could have taken a "grocery store trip" gain, if the trade goes my way I'll trade accordingly.

So I suppose you could say I keep my position sizes smallish, I should take gains more quickly though, as I should losses. I'm essentially flat over the last 1 1/2 year, but with all the time invested, it's been a total abomination.

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

"CP- Can I have a beer now?"

Mark, I thought you were too young to drink!

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

CP- I am, that's why I'm asking.

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

Mark - You can tell the bartender you obtained my permission. ;)

You've got to set the bartender in the mood first. Play this on the jukebox, it should help calm his/her nerves:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdMEx609X_8

Or this one depending on your assessment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odcJ-vS22rI&feature...

Re: Reality check/ Cutting losses quickly

CP- If I may jump in here...I'd bet 95% of all traders/investors would be thrilled to call your abomination their own. Damn, man, to be flat over the last 1 1/2 years is impressive.

Thanks for the beer. I put it on your tab.

Watch List

A week or two ago I made a watch list for myself:

Long:
WEN
IMMR
AIG
SPNG
BA

Short:
FRME

The list has worked tremendously well with one exception: I put about half of my long positions in IMMR, which hasn't done anything really. AIG is the standout.

Tomorrow, I'm going to be watching WEN's earnings closely. If it reports somewhat poor earnings, I have told myself that this will be my chance to enter for what I hope to be a longer term trade. If earnings meet or exceed I'm going to have to see how the reaction is. Estimates are for $0.06/share. I personally really like this one.

I spent some time today looking through regional banks and man I have to say they are feeling a whole lotta pain. Take a look at some in this link:

http://biz.yahoo.com/p/4conameu.html

the one I listed above as a short (FRME) is one in a long list of companies whose earnings are getting pounded as the economic malaise marches on. Many of them are trading below March lows and seem to have no bottom. Is this a sign of things to come for the market in general? I actually am neutral on this. Reason being the large banks were able to raise so much capital that their downside risk is no longer near what it used to be.

For Comic and Sad Relief

Found this on Jesse's Cafe' blog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-twLAaMD9w

Vinod

Did I miss something? Some of you guys know him, right? Everything OK?

Re: Watch List

TOF- Took a look at TYP. I like to see the increased liquidity. It seemed a little to tight to trade before. Might be a play for me tomorrow. Chart wise we sure seem at a cross roads. Perhaps Bev can take a look back to '04. Some major trend lines intersecting right here.

Edit: Although I don't relish the idea of going against John Chambers and his 38,000,000,000.

Re: For Comic and Sad Relief

He really should have been wearing some safety goggles during the making of that video.

There is no free lunch... failure will either break you

or harden you..... how many here have had to sell their home to keep from going belly-up ? after 2000 - 2001, it happened to me... I never gave up, though,,, I just learned to do my own work... Folks like Bill Cara and Bill Fleckenstein are gifts, and should be heeded....

Another boring day

Still waiting for TOG to come in to me a bit to add back to it. 98% cash and just 1 lunch money scalp trade today. Cant find the trigger yet.

SRS SOLD 250@$12.50
SRS BOUGHT 250@12.2895

'Enter a trade only when you have a perceptible edge'

I'm not sure to whom I should attribute the quote. Bill, Geoff, Pat, or Vad all might have posted it at one time or another. Or maybe it's Harrison.

With that in mind, and given nine straight slaps for my last nine entries, it's obvious I need to take another look at my reasons for going in.

Re: Another boring day

PZ- I trust Bill on the PM side of the TOG, and the short bonds I totally understand and have traded. Perhaps today we saw the first signs of divergence of TBT from a down market. But look at the tape for TBT today, man, how do you trade THAT?

Re: 'Enter a trade only when you have a perceptible edge'

My version would be:

Valid setup triggered in terms of your trading system is the only valid reason for entering the trade

The 200 DMA revisited

Remember that one? If I had moved my entire portfolio back in on the long side the day after I read about that strategy (and recall how uncomfortable that would have been emotionally), I'd still be long. And doing quite nicely.

Re: RSI sell signal

If I can't watch the markets, I'll trail a sell stop 1.5 X the 10 day ATR.

If I can watch and the RSI 7 has given a sell signal, I'll watch the hourly charts. When the stock makes an hourly high and the MACD diverges, then I'll exit/sell the stock.

GL

A Drinking Song

Here's a famous drinking song to play once you've softened up that bartender:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWY4_GyLufI&feature...

Re: Watch List

re: WEN.

I'd spend time developing RSI screens of stocks/sectors and try to wait for Triple RSI buys/sells to buy/short. And stick to stocks> $5 since many funds/institutions can't hold stocks under 5 bucks. The except is the capitulation play where the RSI 7 day < 10.

Re: Another boring day

Pz- I'll take boring. In fact, I am very much into living the simple life. My idea of the perfect 'day off' is a few hours in a La-Z-Boy reading a book. Lunch. Walk down to San Andreas Lake. An hour improvising on the piano. A few more hours in the La-Z-Boy with the same book. Dinner. A few more hours in the La-Z-Boy with the same book, and/or a DVD. Bed.

Reading, music, writing. 'Doing time' wouldn't be much of a problem for me.

yawn!

can we really add an exclamation point after a word like "yawn"?

thats what i think about hte action in the gold miners,
yawn.

no power, no conviction to this move, and with gold tracking sideways today gold miners did very little.

yawn!!!

looking to reload should gold move back towards its 200-ma in the high 800's.
a brief touch of $1000 and more will see me sell what little core position i have left before the inevitable crunch.

people think the gold market is small but fail to realize just how much the regular joe is so involved and invested in gold. on canada's version of CNBC gold bug analysts always get the most calls on the call-in shows for investment advice. many many people are heavily invested in gold, dont assume its a small market.

a run above $1000 will be met with a wave of bullish stories and sentiment, a flurry of news releases from criminal mining company CEO's who will proclaim gold is going much higher while their hedge books remain in tact, ready for lower prices as their costs only increase and hedging only eats away at what little profits they make.

so yes, play the market, trade it, but dont drink your own bath water.

i say this as an armature, a nobody who stares at charts and websites all day, what could i possibly know compared to all great writers on gold who only make money by selling you the very metal they claim will only go up.... commissions run deep for men in nice suits who convince you that buying their piece of paper will make you money....

good luck, keep reading stories of "increased demand" or of predictions by men who say commodities are going up while their funds go down and know all the reasons why things happened as they did after the fact....

Re: A Drinking Song

And once you're on the dance floor...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBF67r1LnhE

Re: Another boring day

2nd- Park that La-Z-Boy outside and I'm in. Love the fresh air, sun, rain, what ever.

Re: Another boring day

"Reading, music, writing. 'Doing time' wouldn't be much of a problem for me."

Any particular larceny in mind, 2nd?

Re: Another boring day

2nd- Before you answer, it might be wise to see if davefairtex surfaces.

Re: Another boring day/ Charley Varrick

The perfect crime for someone like me would have to be the bank robbery. You know, the one where I rob the institution that robbed me.

That reminds me of a great crime film from the seventies: Charley Varrick, starring Walter Matthau. If you haven't seen it, you're in for a treat. Joe Don Baker is unforgettable as a Mob heavy.

Raffle Your Beachfont McMansion!?

Fast forward about 1.30 minutes on this link below and check out a multi million dollar home in Fort Lauderdale...going for $10 raffle tickets! Even Zillow says it's worth $3.4M.

http://www.thinkbigworksmall.com/mypage/archive/1/...

heads up from the Rydex traders sentiment.

While I believe we could go up to 1200 on SPX (or even higher) before this bout of inflation runs out of steam, the current point is unsustainable. The Rydex total Bull/bear ratio is 2.73, the highest I can see since 2002. So far the record was in the end 2004. A recent peak was in June 2009 before SPX went down 5%. I think this is a short term trade set up before another leg up. This would confirm Bill's scenario for pullback to 950.

FD: long gold and accumulating TZA FAZ and SRS since yesterday.

Re: Another boring day>>incommunicado/ incognito

Mark- Speaking of vinod and fairtex. The beauty of blogging is one can remain incommunicado and/or incognito at any time and for any reason. It's entirely possible that fairtex was able to enlist vinod for an inside job near the Charles River. You've got me on a crime tangent.

Re: Another boring day>>incommunicado/ incognito

2nd- I guess I'm just always thinking the worst. Too many years as a paramedic and seen so much death and pain. Believe me, it drives my family nuts.

On the crime theme, all though a little gritty, I really liked Liam Neeson in "Taken". Not for the kids.

Re: A Drinking Song

Oh Mac, that is a good one!

Re: Another boring day

"Any particular larceny in mind, 2nd?"

Make it count, make it Grand Larceny. Anything worth doing is worth doing right!

http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/i/ice_t/grand_lar...

Re: yawn!

An additional problem is that I heard that currently only 4% of investors are bullish on the dollar, which to me is the closest equivalent to anti-gold if there was such a thing. I think the dollar is way, way overvalued, too, but shorter term, when I see the boat that heavily loaded on one side, I get very cautious about being on that side with them.

Still have physical, and a couple hundred thousand shares of one dog mining stock that I'm too stubborn to take the loss on, but for the most part I'm waiting on the sidelines for something bad to happen. If I were to go back long, I know it would happen within 24 hrs.

Will my patience pay off, or will I get to watch gold do a moon shot by Monday as the dollar crashes, and watch it from the sidelines, with 7 digits of dollars in the accounts?

Re: yawn!

cheapy- Unless you are including a decimal point...GOOD for you!!

Re: a reminder from David Rosenberg

David, quoting Rosenberg said:> so what happened came as a huge surprise to the masses. [S&P rallied 20% since its low on September 20, made a double top in January and March 2002, then made a new low in October 2002 and then re-tested that low in March 2003].

Ahh we can't claim any surprises this time round cause that genius Roubini has already raised the possibility of a double dip.

Re: yawn!

RE:> no power, no conviction to this move, and with gold tracking sideways today gold miners did very little.

Credit deserved there Doc in remarks on the traps of trading the small caps. I have ECU.TO on the books and it hasn't moved a damn compared to SLW. I see trading SLW with written options as a major focus of my PM trading strategy once everything comes crashing back to earth.

Re: Another boring day/ Charley Varrick

RE:> That reminds me of a great crime film from the seventies: Charley Varrick, starring Walter Matthau. If you haven't seen it, you're in for a treat. Joe Don Baker is unforgettable as a Mob heavy.

I've been passing the recent days with a few films. There's enough room on the screen to watch a dvd in the corner while watching the tape roll. Sergio Leone - loving his films! The Good, The Bad and The Ugly - what a classic!

http://blog.madhedgefundtrader.com/

1)Welcome to the new bubble. In four months we have gone from 35% below the 200 day moving average to 15% above. It turns out that 1,000 in the S&P 500 is 38.2% recovery of the fall from the2007 peak, a great Fibonacci number. DeMark indicators are showing that buying power is getting exhausted. Daily sentiment indicators are 88%bullish. RSI’s and oscillators are over extended.

Every day the buyers show up, marching in lockstep with military precision, to give us our needed spike up at the close to keep the rally alive on the charts one more day. Worst of all, I am getting deluged with emails from subscribers who, having stayed out all year, are asking if they should start buying now, and buying everything. All of this, and we still have the second half of the “W” to discount. If the American stock market was the only issue, I wouldn’t really care, since most of my longs are overseas.

But if the US rolls over like the Bismarck, emerging markets,foreign currencies, commodities, the energies, and junk bonds will be dragged down with it, because everything is so interlinked these days.There will be no place to hide. I think the glass half full crowd is coming to the end of their run, so I would urge investors to pare down some risk. If your friends stay in, and they make a ton of money,that’s fine. Just let them buy the next round of drinks.

http://blog.madhedgefundtrader.com/

Quote of the day from his site:

“I can calculate the motions of heavenly bodies, but never the madness of crowds,” said Sir Isaac Newton, the inventor of calculus and discoverer of Newton’s Laws, who lost his entire fortune in a 17thcentury investment scam called “the south Sea Bubble.

Mad Hedge Fund Trader's Call on Wheat June 16

2) I just thought I’d give you an alert here to put “wheat” on your watch list, with a view to a buy. The harvest for spring wheat is in full swing and the weather has been great, both here and in India, so prices have dropped $1.00 from the $7.25 top it put in two weeks ago.

You usually see peak production in June, so this is traditionally a timely window to put on medium term long positions, as cash strapped farmers hedge known inputs. New plantings are down 25% in Argentina, and 18% in Canada. A multiyear drought continues in Australia, where my younger sister, unable to coax life out of her 7,000 acres near Esperance, has resorted to driving a huge Caterpillar truck at the ore mines up North to make ends meet.

It’s just a matter of time before the food riots resume. For the raging long term bull case for wheat see http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/May_22__2009.html. There is maybe $1.00 of downside here if we get perfect weather, but a possible double on the upside, and more if we get lucky. This is the kind of risk/reward ratio I am constantly hunting for. Wheat is one of the few Ag plays that is not overbought right now.

Mad Trader's Suggestion for Africa Play

2) When things slow down and there is nothing to do, like now, I do deep research for the unfound investment opportunity. Feel like investing in a state sponsor of terrorism? How about a country whose leaders have stolen $400 billion in the last decade and have seen 300 foreign workers kidnapped? Another country lost four wars in the last 40 years. Still interested?

How about a country that suffers one of the world’s highest AIDs rates, endures regular insurrections where all of the westerners are massacred, and racked up 5 million dead in a continuous civil war? Then Africa is the place for you, the world’s largest source of gold, diamonds, chocolate, and cobalt! The countries above are Libya, Nigeria, Egypt, and the Congo. Below the radar of the investment community since the colonial days, the Dark Continent has recently been attracting the attention of large hedge funds and private equity firms. Goldman Sachs has set up Emerging Capital Partners, which has invested $1.6 billion there. China sees the writing on the wall, and has launched a latter day colonization, taking a 20% equity stake in South Africa’s Standard Bank, the largest on the continent. In fact, foreign direct investment has jumped from $53 billion to $61 billion, while cross border M & A leapt from $10.2 billion to $26.3 billion.

The angle here is that all of the headlines above are in the price, that price is very low, and the perceived risk is much greater than actual risk. Price earnings multiples are low single digits, cash flows are huge, and returns of capital within two years are not unheard of. The reality is that Africa’s 900 million have unlimited demand for almost everything, and there is scant supply, with many firms enjoying local monopolies. The big plays are your classic early emerging market targets, like banking, telecommunications, electric power, and other infrastructure.

For example, in the last decade, the number of telephones has soared from 350,000 to 10 million. It reminds me of the early days of investing in China in the seventies, when the adventurous only played when they could double their money in two years because the stakes were so high. This is definitely not for day traders. If you are willing to give up a lot of short term liquidity for a high long term return, then look at the Market Vectors Africa Index ETF (AFK), which has risen 59% since March, and the SPDR S&P Emerging Middle east & Africa ETF (GAF).

http://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/May_22__2009.html

So, how did JL's overnight swings work out?

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=YRCW&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=XRM&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=PMI&p=1&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=OCNF&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=PACR&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=HYC&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=GKK&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CTIC&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CPF&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=ANPI&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

Not bad. Not bad at all. One significant loss against mostly significant gains. He judges whether it's an overnight hold just before closing, so one can imagine him picking the odd weak holding under pressure, which is ok as long as he's covered by 3/4 of profitable holdings. Definitely more profitable on such "yawn" days as yesterday than watching the black boxes profiting at everyone else's expense.

I will continue to annotate and follow as time permits.

JL concentrated on one trade only yesterday - AIG

http://ibankcoin.com/chart_addict/2009/08/06/the-a...

Was it TOF who successfully played AIG as well?

Have a look at how he read the chart through the day.

He played C as well and is an overnight hold.

Re: Watch List

i'm perfectly happy investing in a sub $5 stock that institutions can't hold. i know IMMR and WEN quite well and feel they're both amply undervalued to take for a spin.

Michael Steinhardt

What a pleasure listening to this man talk. It is somewhat dated.
At the very least listen from 4-9 minutes in.

http://paul.kedrosky.com/archives/2009/08/michael_...

Re: Another boring day/ Charley Varrick

Les,
You need to get Once upon a time in America. I think it is the best film of all time. There is many versions. I recommend the 4 hour version. There is a 7 hour directors cut (too much) and a 2 hour ADD american version that is worthless. The 4 hour version is so well crafted you will think Robert Deniro is a member of your family after it.
Bob

Re: Another boring day/ Charley Varrick

Thanks Bobbyo. Noted this film in the wiki bio of Leone. Will give it a look. With Deniro to boot? Great!

1st rudimentary scan for MACDh divergence

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=ABK&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=ABR&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=APAC&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=CT&p=5&yr=0&mn=0&...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=FIG&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=OWW&p=5&yr=0&mn=0...

http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=SOLR&p=5&yr=0&mn=...

This is the first attempt to scan for MACDh divergence and a work in progress in creating a scanning tool, of which I have no idea at present. These would make a watch list for the day for me.

Looking over the significant number of biotechs that were the playground of JL et al. recently, a quick glance backed up by the market summary of stockcharts indicates that the fast money has quit biotech for banks. A heads up that may be useful today:

http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/Favorites.CServ...

There are no recommendations here to buy or sell.

Re: yawn!

MarkW,

Sure, Its good for it to have gotten to bigger numbers, but as I see it, its measured in what more and more resembles "digital confetti" where its just OWED to someone and we PRETEND its going to be repaid with interest.

I was thinking about it, and trying to determine if my fears are justified or not. In all honesty, I could make a good case that the Fed has added 3 zeros to the money. In the early 1900's being a MILLIONAIRE really MEANT something. I bet there weren't but hundreds of them in the nation back then. Who had 50,000 one ounce gold pieces, or its equivalent? Let's face it. Today you'd wonder if you can safely retire with only one million dollars, especially if you'd been forced by the economy to retire early like I have.

But wait... 3 zeros? The inflation numbers only say 2, so how can that be? To which I'd reply "Look who's doing the figuring...". Its the same folks that are printing the digital confetti. Today there are a hundred BILLIONAIREs. How can that many be that rich if the money supply hasn't increased dramatically?

So I really do worry that the WORTH of those 7 digits could just evaporate on me some stormy Monday morning. That's what happened to the other Bernie's ponzi scheme victims, and to be honest, I don't see all that much difference between the two schemes, other than who are the perps and victims, and the size of the fraud.

Calendar

http://ronsen.blogspot.com/2009/08/calendar.html

First, I want to repeat something an analyst told me the other day. "We are in a bubble. The only question is whether the calendar reads 1999 or March 2000".

Victor Sperandeo said it another way, "you ride the false train of hope before it gets to the chasm...and then you jump off".

Goldman Sachs $100 Million Trading Days Reach Record

Goldman Sachs $100 Million Trading Days Reach Record

By Christine Harper
Aug. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. made more
than $100 million in trading revenue on a record 46 separate
days during the second quarter, or 71 percent of the time,
breaking the previous high of 34 days in the prior three months.
Trading losses occurred on two days during the months of
April, May and June, down from eight in the first quarter, the
New York-based bank said today in a filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission. The company made at least
$50 million on 58 of the 65 trading days during the quarter, or
89 percent of the time.
Goldman Sachs, which was the biggest U.S. securities firm
before converting to a bank last year, posted the biggest profit
in its history during the second quarter as revenue from trading
and equity underwriting reached all-time highs. The company,
which has returned $10 billion to the U.S. Treasury and paid
$1.42 billion in dividends and to cancel warrants, also made its
largest market bets during the period.
“It’s very counterintuitive to think that they’d be able to
generate this much profit and this much revenue in the middle of
an ongoing recession,” said William Cohan, a former banker at
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Lazard Ltd. and author of “House of
Cards” about the collapse of Bear Stearns Cos. “But the fact
that so many of their competitors are out of business or
severely wounded has put them in a very strong position.”

Trading Days

In fiscal year 2008, the firm had 90 days in which traders
made more than $100 million, compared with 88 in 2007. In fiscal
2006, the figure was 49 days, up from 18 in 2005 and 14 in 2004.
Goldman Sachs changed its fiscal year in 2009 to end in December
instead of November.
Goldman Sachs’s trading results reflected the firm’s
willingness to take on more risk during the period. Value-at-
risk, an estimate of how much the firm could lose in any given
day, rose to an average of $245 million in the second quarter
from $240 million in the first quarter and $184 million in the
second quarter of 2008. Most of the increase in the second
quarter came from bets on equities, the company said.
“They take risks for their clients and for themselves and
they’ve figured out a way in this market, with less competition
bidding for these things, to make money,” Cohan said.
Trading and principal investments accounted for 78 percent
of the bank’s revenue in the second quarter of 2009, up from 59
percent in the second quarter of 2008. Net interest income, the
difference between the interest the firm pays and what it
charges, climbed 60 percent from the second quarter of 2008 as
the company’s interest expense dropped 83 percent.

FDIC Backing

Banks such as Goldman Sachs are benefiting from lower
borrowing costs after the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in
October started guaranteeing bank debt issues that mature within
three years. Goldman Sachs said in today’s filing it had $25.1
billion of debt guaranteed by the FDIC under the agency’s
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program. The bank sold about $30
billion of the FDIC-backed securities between November and
March, according to company filings.
Today’s filing showed the weighted average interest rate
paid by Goldman Sachs on its unsecured short-term borrowings
dropped to 1.70 percent in June from 2.14 percent in March and
from 3.37 percent in November.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content