Another brief move above S&P 1100 was quickly rejected again this morning, with traders sensing this market is running out of steam at resistance. The eight-day upside romp covered over +7.5% from low to high, yet volume absolutely evaporated on the advance.
Healthy markets need fuel (volume) in order to continue moving upward; since October 30th SPY volume has plummeted over 50%. This is unbelievable -- where is all the institutional demand?
Eventually the feeble upside volume and lack of institutional sponsorship is going to come back to haunt the Bulls. Just as in the case with momentum divergences, which we have been pointing out, the paucity of volume often won’t cause market strength to crack immediately, but should be a clear warning equities are not on stable ground.
Oil (USO –3.1%) looks increasingly vulnerable to a large correction; the US dollar ETF (UUP +1.42%) has seen a huge increase in upside volume in both the stock and option call contracts; and gold (GLD –1.30%) is certainly extended, vulnerable to a sharp decline. Put it all together, and the background is set for equities to move lower.
All that is needed is some downside price action, a few lower highs and lower lows, violating support levels, unable to hold key moving averages. Once S&P 1080 is taken out, watch the action around the 50-day MA (1061) to see if institutions step up and support their positions. If that level doesn’t contain the down-draft, then the early Nov lows (1029) and the 89-day moving average (1028) will be the next key support.
As always this commentary is merely a forum for pointing out possible areas of interest for traders. As we pointed out late last week and in the closing paragraphs to the Week In Review introduction this week, until prices actually decline, independent traders leaning heavily short are asking for trouble. Just because you FEEL the market is overvalued doesn’t mean it is about to come crashing down.
Make your lists, doing your homework ahead of time so if the anticipated decline begins, you are prepared to act boldly and decisively. Otherwise, when the action starts, you will in extremis, unable to act at all.
Have a great evening.
Comments
RSI Tool
Is there a time when the RSI Tool actually uses the closing prices at the end of the day? Sometimes it seems to use them around midnight EST. Last night, it didn't start using the previous days closing numbers until around 3 or 4am EST.
Thanks.
100,000,000 add'tl shares for UUP
http://tinyurl.com/ybmfoqh
Re: RSI Tool
Bill noticed that as well. I suspect last night, our data source updated late, so I grabbed updates when I thought the data would be new, and it didn't get fixed until my system decided that data was stale later in the night. It's on my list of things to look into.
Poll on comment solution
Ok, I want to make sure I come up with a solution to policing the comments that makes the most people happy. So I put a few options in a poll, and I'd like to know what everyone thinks. I'll close the poll sometime tomorrow (at my discretion, depending on when I feel like implementing a solution). If I've missed something or if there are other strong opinions, put them in the comments there. I will look at the results of the poll and all the comments before I make any changes. Please give me your input, because I really don't want to implement anything that will push away a large part of the community.
Here is the poll
Most Profitable Airlines in 2009
Economatica reports on the most profitable airlines for the first 9 months of 2009 (profit, NYSE symbol, and ROI YTD in parentheses):
1. TAM (Brazil), $674M, TAM on NYSE, +81.2%YTD
2- GOL (Brazil), $267.2M, GOL on the NYSE, +178.72%
3. LAN (Chile), $122.3M, LFL, +76.4%
4. Skywest, $64.2M, SKYW, -20.2%
5. Jetblue, $47M, JBLU, -26.7%
The other major airlines have all accumulated losses in the first nine months of this year:
6-Southwest (-$16M), LUV, 0%
7-U.S. Airways (-$125M), LCC, -62.4%
8-Continental Airlines (-$367M), CAL, -21.6%
9-UAL Corp. (-$411M), UAUA, -40.0%
10-AMR (-$1.124B) AMR, -48.5%
11-Delta Airlines (-$1.212B), DAL, -35.7%
The legacy of Susan Boyle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8o4eaWlqmlo
http://tinyurl.com/ybv2o69
Some people will understand this when I say that Goldman Sachs had better understand what is going on here.
When the Goldman Sachs’ CEO Lloyd Blankfein told the Financial Times of London this week that his bank was doing God’s work, there was quite a negative reaction.
http://www.bloggingstocks.com/2009/11/09/goldman-s...
Not to worry says the CEO, "We control the U.S. Treasury, the Fed and several central banks around the world, and perhaps half of the U.S. Congress. Besides, we will spend a billion or whatever amount it takes to buy crisis managers to smooth over my stupid remark."
No matter, thinks the man.
Lloyd, listen up. You and you company are done like dinner. Just watch the Susan Boyle video and think, for once, what is happening here.
Your arrogance knows no bounds, and in your job you followed jerks made from the same cloth. But, the People will cut you to pieces as easily as they can make a Susan Boyle.
Trust me Lloyd; you and your kind have never been one of the People. Like with Susan, the People will make the ultimate decision.
sell alerts
We have a sell alert now for GLD, and for SLW.
SLW completed (more or less) an evening doji star reversal pattern.
My shorts from yesterday - MMM, JWN, and GPS all dutifully tipped over - thanks to a down market. "Don't confuse brains with a bear market." All three of them have now printed either lower highs, or a double top. Of the 3, only MMM has had a weekly MACD rollover. I'm going to let them ride as a swing trade. (TIF tipped over too, but I didn't choose to short it because I felt it was more risky than the others).
Will GLD and SLW follow suit? They seem more dangerous shorts to me. One day does not a reversal pattern make. However, SLV is continuing to form a nice right shoulder to an H&S pattern, and SLV:GLD seems to be in a clear downtrend at this moment. If it continues, SLW should follow SLV along right off the cliff. And where SLV goes, GLD should follow.
peak gold
In apparent refutation to GLD's sell alert, here's a story from the Telegraph about Peak Gold. Source: Aaron Regent, president of Barrick, as reported by Pritchard from the Telegraph.
I'm a sucker for peak everything stories. Yet I must wonder at the timing of this one - apparently the peak was reached in 2000, so it's not exactly fresh news. So why would Mr Regent emphasize it if they're trying to close that hedge book on favorable terms. Perhaps the hedge book is already closed?
"There is a strong case to be made that we are already at 'peak gold'," he told The Daily Telegraph at the RBC's annual gold conference in London.
"Production peaked around 2000 and it has been in decline ever since, and we forecast that decline to continue. It is increasingly difficult to find ore," he said."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/in...
I think you might like this movie (1 hour +/-)
Dear Bill:
I am energized by the your comments about GS and Susan Boyle, and the premise of having an elevating purpose worth pursuing even against adversity, etc. In the spirit of that, I thought I'd send you the link to this movie I recently found about a truly remarkable historical figure whom I'd never heard of before - the Chevalier des St Georges, otherwise known as Le Mozart Noir:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vILAgsHUlt8
http://tinyurl.com/yeofnlz
Best,
(Anon)
Honolulu
Anon, Thank you. I enjoyed this movie immensely.
/Anon
Re: The legacy of Susan Boyle
"When the Goldman Sachs’ CEO Lloyd Blankfein told the Financial Times of London this week that his bank was doing God’s work, there was quite a negative reaction."
It seems evident just who is Blankfein's idea of god. (Small G fits here.)
Re: peak gold
re: comments from a Barrick chief about gold...
i think we all know what to do with any sort of advice from a gold mining CEO about the price of gold.
barrick has done nothing but call it wrong on the POG, and most mining CEO's know nothing more than the rest of us about where the price is going. all they are talented at is explaining why their shares cant cash in on a rising price of gold.
the hardcore contrarians would look at Barrick's closing of their hedge book and ultra-bullish stance as actually bearish. remember they are still hedged in other ways (currency/base metals) so this dragon is still not slayed.
if only they spent more money on mining and less on their public image they would make investors money.
Re: RSI Tool
I too have looked for a time shift in updating...this would if possible, be very helpful. I do not know the moving parts or bottlenecks if any, so I did not want to ?...thanks for asking the needed question!
ADVFN
Looking quickly at 0815:
Strong:
China (very)
Mixed:
Japan,HK,India,France,UK,Ireland
Weak:
Australia,Greece (Australian dollar hyped on CNBC)
$ down against most, but up vs. HKD,BRL,RUB
* it is what it is...will be what it will be.
Widespread Contaminated Gold
A bit more on "God's Work"...
And here’s what the Chinese allegedly uncovered:
Roughly 15 years ago – during the Clinton Administration [think Robert Rubin, Sir Alan Greenspan and Lawrence Summers] – between 1.3 and 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten blanks were allegedly manufactured by a very high-end, sophisticated refiner in the USA [more than 16 Thousand metric tonnes]. Subsequently, 640,000 of these tungsten blanks received their gold plating and WERE shipped to Ft. Knox and remain there to this day. I know folks who have copies of the original shipping docs with dates and exact weights of “tungsten” bars shipped to Ft. Knox.
The balance of this 1.3 million – 1.5 million 400 oz tungsten cache was also plated and then allegedly “sold” into the international market.
Apparently, the global market is literally “stuffed full of 400 oz salted bars”.
http://tinyurl.com/yetz6qm
Paul on CNBC
He was in rare form and feeling it regarding the FED, even though leis-man (OK, maybe not his best spelling) did his best to derail his message (trap him).
Comments
I have watched with interest the evolution and struggle related to the comments. I have read the rules and see where there might be some confusion.
The rules are all about what we cannot do. After reading them and considering what I have observed in the struggle here, I wonder what one can write. Is it only a matter of time before comments get shut down again? Then I see the poll and wonder if there will be a clique managing the comments whose good graces we must achieve?
I think it would be helpful to have a list that clarifies what we can do. Something that specifically identifies what kind of discourse is desired. Maybe something that clearly lists the priorities, goals and expectations of the site and of all of the contributors.
Goldman Sachs (from the web)
THE LLOYD’s Prayer
Our Chairman,
Who Art At Goldman,
Blankfein Be Thy Name.
The Rally’s Come. God’s Work Be Done
On Earth As There’s No Fear Of Correction.
Give Us This Day Our Daily Gains,
And Bankrupt Our Competitors
As You Taught Lehman and Bear Their Lessons.
And Bring Us Not Under Indictment.
For Thine Is The Treasury,
The House And The Senate
Forever and Ever.
Goldman.
Bullish until I am not
Ok, OK, so who cares, apparently I do not.
I am getting very excited about potential upward momentum our markets could have.
I picked up some FSLR and RIMM after hours...starter position only.
To me this is trying for a single and if it turns into a double or triple or home run, so be it...I will give it some breathing room and have set stops too.
Not advice...mostly giving myself a chance to anchor my thought processes and elicit dialog from others that may have a similar bent and/or other viewpoints
Comments welcome!
Re: Goldman Sachs (from the web)
I can only laugh heartily as I fall onto my carpet from having choked on my coffee...this is really funny!
Re: Bullish until I am not
The odd thing about the latest rally is that alternative energy, and solars in particular, have been reluctant participants. And whatever strength they have had has been due to the rise in oil prices. That's not to say I don't believe in their long-term prospects. In fact, I think it is particularly strange given that this sector of the economy has continued to grow during one of the harshest recessions in generations. Maybe the collapse of ASPs (and Chinese dumping) has had something to do with that?
I like SPWRA in particular, but have no current position. I do have TAN in my retirement account.
I was going to wait for the correction in the broader market to play out before trying SPWRA again. Good luck with your FSLR, though.
International Trade
Released on 11/13/2009 8:30:00 AM For September, 2009
Trade Balance Level
Prior $-30.7 B
Consensus $-32.5 B
Consensus $-34.1 B to $-29.5 B
Actual $-36.5 B
Highlights
The U.S. international trade deficit in September widened significantly on higher oil imports. But the good news is that the freeze up in global trade appears to be thawing as U.S. export rose significantly. The overall U.S. trade deficit widened to $36.5 billion from a revised $30.7 billion worth of red ink in August. The shortfall was worse than the consensus projection for a $32.5 gap. Exports rose 2.9 percent while imports jumped 5.8 percent. The worsening of the trade deficit was led by a wider petroleum shortfall which came in at $20.5 billion compared to $16.6 billion the previous month. The nonpetroleum gap increased to $25.9 billion from $24.3 billion in August.
The widening in the petroleum deficit was due to both more barrels imported and higher prices. Physical barrels imported increased 6.6 percent in September after dropping 9.4 percent the month before. The price of imported oil rose to $68.17 per barrel from $64.75 in August.
Year-on-year, overall exports rose to minus 13.2 percent from minus 20.6 percent in August while imports improved to down 20.6 percent from minus 28.5 percent the previous month.
Overall, the rise in export appears to be more real than the boost in imports. Imports were up on higher oil prices, more barrels of oil, and more automotive imports from Canada. The gain in autos was to replenish auto inventories after cash-for-clunkers. Non-auto imports were up moderately. But manufacturers are benefitting from a lower dollar and healthy gains were seen in capital goods, autos, and consumer goods. While the headline numbers could weigh on the dollar, the details favor it. Equities should like the boost in exports.
Import and Export Prices
Released on 11/13/2009 8:30:00 AM For October, 2009
Prior Actual
Export Prices - M/M change -0.3 % 0.3 %
Export Prices - Y/Y change -5.6 % -3.4 %
Import Prices - M/M change 0.1 % 0.7 %
Import Prices - Y/Y change -12.0 % -5.7 %
Highlights
Import prices went up in October, in what bears are certain to claim as early evidence of dollar-based inflationary pressures. Import prices jumped 0.7 percent in October driven by a jump in natural gas prices which soared 24 percent but are since on the retreat. Industrial supplies, which include metals, are extending their run of increases. There's even an unusual rise for finished goods with prices for imported capital goods up 0.2 percent which follows a long run of no-change readings. Prices for imported consumer goods rose 0.3 percent following a run of mostly negative readings.
The export side of the report also shows pressure in October with export prices up 0.3 percent and up 0.3 percent even after excluding a price dip for agricultural exports. Industrial supplies also show pressure on the export side with capital-goods prices up a noticeable 0.2 percent though consumer-goods exports fell a tenth.
The year-on-year rate for import prices looks benign at minus 5.7 percent. But the Bureau of Labor Statistics is noting that the index is up 8.1 percent since February. And the BLS is also saying that the price increases for imported raw materials and metals, including precious metals, are in fact "tied" to the dollar. Today's report does show some pressure and is consistent with inflation expectations evident in the financial markets
, namely gains in gold and other commodities. Commodity prices popped higher in immediate reaction to the report. Next week will offer two key readings on inflation, the producer price report on Tuesday and the consumer price report on Wednesday.
Bill Hunter
We haven't seen Bill Hunter since the forum reopened.
I miss him for the Cara 100 upgraded / downgraded reports.
Re: Bullish until I am not
Thanks
Re: Bill Hunter
I'm still here but wondering if the board wants the Cara 100 Ratings Changes to continue.
Please let me know.
Regards,
BH
Re: Bill Hunter
Cara 100 Ratings Changes are helpful. I like to see them continue to be posted if your schedule permits.
Thanks
Sastocks
Re: Bill Hunter
Yes, they provide a great backdrop for me personally...the sheeple must be fed by HB&B you know.
However, this is much work also...the question becomes for you, are diminishing returns or value add the only factors to consider.
Re: Bill Hunter
It's very helpful for me everyday. Recently, I have traded a lot in Cara 100 stocks.
Many thanks for your hard works.
Cara 100 Ratings Changes
Good morning. With the new changes in place, I'm not sure if the majority wants this column to continue but by request here is today's report:
Upgrades:
QCOM - to Outperform @ Wells Fargo
JNPR - to Outperform @ Oppenheimer. PT = $31
New Coverage:
ADBE - UBS Initiates with a Buy. PT = 43
CHRW - Piper Jaffray Initiates with a Neutral
ORCL - UBS Initiates with a Buy. PT = $27
PT Raised:
DIS - from $28 to $31 @ Credit Suisse. Outperform
---------
Note: If most of you find this column useful, I'm happy to keep providing it. If, on the other hand, most of you find this column annoying, please let me know.
Thanks,
BH
Consumer Sentiment 66 vs. 72 consensus
Released on 11/13/2009 9:55:00 AM For November, 2009
Sentiment Index
Prior 70.6
Consensus 71.0
Consensus Range 69.0
Actual 66.0
Highlights
Consumer confidence is having a fainting spell. The Reuters/University of Michigan's reading on confidence, the consumer sentiment index, fell back a very steep 4.6 points to a very weak 66.0. Weakness is split between current conditions and the outlook. Inflation expectations remain subdued. Consumer confidence is declining even as manufacturing, housing and even retail report concrete improvement. The weakness is rooted in the still contracting jobs market. Equities and commodities dipped in immediate reaction to today's report. But note that movements in consumer confidence data don't always track movements in retail spending. The retail trade report for October, where the outlook is good, will be Monday's highlight.
Market Consensus Before Announcement
The Reuter's/University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment index for October rose 1.2 points from mid-month to 70.6 but was still down from September’s level of 73.5. Weakness in October was primarily in the expectations index which fell to 68.6 from 73.5 in September. The current conditions index actually edged up to 73.7 in October from 73.4 the prior month.
SP 500
What’s driving this market? The SP500 made a marginal new high, so what sectors are driving this?
We can look at nine major sectors for clues identified by:
XLY
XLP
XLE
XLF
XLV
XLI
XLB
XLK
XLU
This list shows the following:
The sectors leading are consumer discretionary and staples, health care, and technology. The sectors that failed to make new highs are energy, financials, and utilities. The industrials and materials seem somewhat neutral.
So now based on one’s trading philosophy we have a potential roadmap for attack.
Bull H thank you for your daily contributions.
Re: Cara 100 Ratings Changes
Keep it going.
FSLR bouncing off 115 with some vigor
It's not a formal buy alert (the 6m RSI isn't low enough) but its daily RSI is now above 30.
FD: I'm long FSLR
EIA Natural Gas Report
Released on 11/13/2009 10:30:00 AM For wk11/6, 2009
Prior Actual
Weekly Change 29 bcf 25 bcf
Highlights
Natural gas in storage rose 25 billion cubic feet in the Nov. 6 week.
Re: Bill Hunter
I don't always trade Cara stocks, but find it very useful to have a beginning of the day summary of their public position in the brokerage universe. It's great that retail traders can know this blog provides this kind of monitoring.
CTRP getting headlines after earnings, UTA
UTA is a smaller china secondary play that reports Monday and should do very well if CTRP is any indication.
buck giving it back
Dollar down -0.25% driving gold +6.4. Interestingly, silver is only just barely positive, and oil is still -0.47.
Re: Consumer Sentiment 66 vs. 72 consensus
The "Market" cheers up the low Consumer Sentiment.
Dow +90
SP500 +8
MCD +1.27 to 63.45, highest level, except 64.46 on 01/06.
AXP +0.33 to 39.82, almost 52-week high
TIF +0.41 to 42.26
and the list goes on.
BTW, today is Friday the 13th.
JWN short stopped out @ 33.51
Decided I wanted to keep my single after JWN's big drop this morning.
DOW RALLY
ALOHA !!
This chart puts the current DOW rally into perspective from a historical view point!
LINK: http://www.chartoftheday.com/20091113.htm?T
If you have not subscribed to this free service it is worth the effort as sometimes they come up with some very topical charts that fall into the category "a picture is worth a thousand words"!
Market to stay afloat until HB&B finishes fortifying their coffe
I received an email from my Fidelity account last week indicating that numerous HB&B's (Giant Squid, BOA, GE, FRE, etc.) had corporate note offerings planned for this week. It is clear that HB&B are fortifying their coffers with private money (in addition to the public money they already have). With the new wave of Alt A and Option Arm resets just beginning + commercial mortgage defaults and roll overs, HB&B will need tons of cushion. I suspect they will keep the market up while this money grab from private investors is in progress.
Add to that the trillions of fiat floating around world wide, near zero interest rates and a need for under performing portfolio managers to chase performance, it is difficult to envision the market going down too far, at least until this year is out, but probably longer.
Re: Consumer Sentiment 66 vs. 72 consensus
So, that is what they meant by black friday...and just think, I was going to bet red today.
Re: Consumer Sentiment 66 vs. 72 consensus
It's hard for maket going down today.
Bill once wrote "Trade what you see, not what you think". Today is a good example.
This maket is
up on no news
up strongly on good news
up on bad news.
It's so easy for them to pull up the market: "SHORT DOLLAR".
The dollar index is 75.435, -0.26 -0.34%.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15839171/site/14081545/
CLINTON VS OBAMA
ALOHA !!
Just comparing two Democratic Administrations in terms of spending and debt according to the US TREASURY DAILY STATEMENT. Naturally Clinton was fortunate enough to be President during a TECH BUBBLE, which pretty much ended when he left office, but BUBBLE or not and surplus or not the spending and debt never abated during the Clinton reign.
The increases are staggering and points to the long term demise of the US Dollar, but then why should that be a surprise since any brief study of any Empire shows the same pattern of rampant debt destruction.
This shows the exact data for each FY(Fiscal Year)for the day of November 10th.
** FY 1999 **
MEDICARE - $24.6 BIL
SOCIAL SECURITY - $44.7BIL
DEFENSE - $11BIL
UNCLASSIFIED - $39.6BIL
OPERATING CASH BALANCE - ($16.5BIL)
TOTAL DEBT - $1.8TRIL
** FY 2010 **
MEDICARE - $66.1BIL
SOCIAL SECURITY - $77.3BIL
DEFENSE - $30.7BIL
UNCLASSIFIED - $52.4BIL
OPERATING CASH BALANCE - ($195.3BIL)
TOTAL DEBT - $6.2TRIL
What this shows me is it is clear that the US government under both the REP and DEMS has no intention of ever shrinking or cutting budgets. It also shows me that "embedded inflation" attacks the US government's bottom line just as it does each citizen. A toilet seat on a US submarine built back in 1998 cost $100 and now it is $400! The US government pays more like we do.
I have been critical of Nixon and Connolly for their HUBRIS with regard to
their attitude of EMPIRE and the US Dollar. Here are a few more modern day examples of the same HUBRIS OF EMPIRE ...
Sec Of State Madeline Albright 1995: "If we have to use force, it is because we are America. We are the indispensable Nation. We stand tall. We see farther into the future." Blowback 2000 Chalmers Johnson
Sec Of State Madeline Albright: When asked by Leslie Stahl in an interview in 1996 as to whether the sanctions on Iraq were worth the price after having killed half a million Iraqi children, more than Hiroshima, Albright replied; "I think this is a very hard choice, but the price - we think the price is worth it ..."
In 2007, Deputy Sec Of State Richard Armitage summarized US Foreign Policy by this comment ... "Look f_ck_r, you do what we want!" Recorded on page 44 of the ECONOMIST, "A Falling Star", 2007.
Then in terms of DEFENSE ... In the FT an article entitled "How The West Can Exit", dated Oct 5, 2009, US Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke said this when asked to define victory in Iraq ... "We'll know it when we see it."
Awe inspiring indeed!
God only knows what is said behind closed doors! For an example of what is possible behind closed doors just review the LBJ TAPES. LBJ sent tens of thousands of young Americans to their death just so he could look good for another year or so, long enough to pass the buck to the next President! Yet the message is clear to the rest of the World and no doubt the rest of the World is sick and tired of the US HUBRIS backed by unending DEBT and threats. The whole "Benevolent Dictator" thing is out the window, as now America is the lazy bum brother-in-law who comes to stay for a week and never leaves always greeting you with "Hey, can I borrow $20 bucks, man?" Its embarrassing. The amount of SPENDING and DEBT the US generates on a daily basis is just plain embarrassing! There is a big difference between "loving your country" and wanting it to become fiscally responsible and viable for future generations. IT'S A HUGE DIFFERENCE ...
Friday the 13th - Read for fun
Friday the 13th - A Lucky Day for the Markets?
The U.S. equity markets have managed to edge higher this morning despite weak Consumer Sentiment data, as Friday the 13th tends to be luckier than you might think. Historically and on average, the Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq Composite have been up more often than not on this superstitious day. The Nasdaq Composite has fared best amongst the three indexes as it has traded up 61% of the time with an average gain of 0.23%.
So far this year there has been 3 occurrences when the markets have traded on Friday the 13th (2/13 and 3/13, as well as today) versus only 1 day in 2008 on 6/13/2008. If the markets closed in positive territory today, it will mark the second time this year that the markets have been up on Friday the 13th for the day. See below for historical averages for the Dow[.DJI 10291.33 93.86 (+0.92%) ], S&P [.SPX 1096.19 8.95 (+0.82%) ]and Nasdaq [COMP 2169.51 20.49 (+0.95%) ]on Friday the 13th.
Dow since 1896:
Friday the 13th:
o Avg. gain of 0.02%
o Up 58% of the time when it gained an avg. of 0.68%, down 40% of the time when it fell an avg. -0.91%, and flat ~2% in 4/13/2001, 1/13/1956, & 6/13/1902
o Biggest gain 2.66% in 12/13/1929
o Biggest drop -6.91% in 10/13/1989
S&P since1928:
Friday the 13th:
o Avg. gain of 0.04%
o Up 59% of the time when it gained an avg. of 0.65% , down 41% of the time when it fell an avg. -0.84%
o Biggest gain 3.34% in 10/13/2000
o Biggest drop -6.11% in 10/13/1989
Nasdaq Composite since 1971:
Friday the 13th:
o Avg. gain of 0.23%
o Up 61% of the time when it gained an avg. of 0.83 % , down 39% of the time when it fell an avg. -0.73%
o Biggest gain 7.87% in 10/13/2000
o Biggest drop -3.09% in 10/13/1989
Leading the Dow higher today are: Disney [DIS 30.27 1.22 (+4.2%) ], McDonald's[MCD 63.65 1.48 (+2.38%) ], IBM [IBM 127.34 1.08 (+0.86%) ], Exxon Mobil [XOM 72.94 1.04 (+1.45%) ], and United Technologies [UTX 67.88 1.18 (+1.77%) ].
http://www.cnbc.com/id/33910357/site/14081545?__so...
The Search for Higher Yield
With my brokerage account and MM paying virtually no interest, I opened up a savings account at Everbank that pays 1.5%. For a higher yield than that, albeit with higher risk, I have invested some funds in a combo of TIP and TLT/IEI. This combo yields around 3.5%. I figure that if deflation is here to stay, the treasury ETFs TLT/IEI will do well counteracting the drag caused by the inflation protected ETF TIP's falling value. Conversely, if inflation starts picking up, the price rise of TIP will counteract the price fall of the treasury ETFs. A long term chart bears out this balance, more or less. :-}
With chronically high unemployment, anemic growth in the US and a secular change in the US consumer mentality from spendthrifts to savers (IMHO), I can only see deflation in the near/intermediate term. Quantitative easing, stimulus programs and other federal forays into distributing free money may lead to inflation and indeed, hyperinflation sooner than I foresee, thus leading to Bill's TOG, but as of now, there are few or no inflationary signs. I will stay vigilant.
Financials
Looking pretty weak today...Goldman, JPM, WFC all looking weak.
Price of gold.
Recently, I read an opinion (do not recall where) explaining why gold prices are so high. It stated: The price of gold may or may not rise because of inflation, deflation, excessive money printing, political instability, wars, etc. etc. However, one thing that is sure to boost gold prices is bad government policy.
I found it very profound. Thought I would share.
Re: Bull Hunter
BH,
Absolutely, please continue posting the Cara 100 rating changes. I find them very beneficial and timely.
Regards,
Monty
Re: CLINTON VS OBAMA
Kaimu,
If you haven't already, I hope you'll watch the movie Burn After Reading by the Cohen Brothers. Priceless. Yes, and you are right, it is galling to us outside to look in to how far America has strayed from "principles to live by" that it fought for. The joke in Canada is, we hope America builds a wall along our border. We'll defend it from this side.
FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
Per David A. Rosenberg
Chief Economist & Strategist
FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
The reason — there is a wave of mortgage refinancings coming in the housing market for one, and not only that, but in the commercial space, there are 2.7 trillion of debt coming due through 2011 and another 1.5 trillion of leveraged loans (see page 24 of Thursday’s FT). In other words, the default rate is going to rise even further and the Fed tightening policy would only aggravate that situation. In other words, the Fed is simply immobile for at least the next two years.
Here is a chart that DaveF posted yesterday that shows the problem graphically.
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
Telestar3d -
"...the Fed is simply immobile for at least the next two years."
The Fed can alter the reserve ratios of financial institutions and profoundly contract monetary supply. The Fed is, I assume, behind the banks' 'extend and pretend' game allowed by the FDIC, OTS, and that other regulator I can't think of right now. That is, in effect, an easing of reserve ratios without a declaration of such. Fund rates are only one of the Fed's small but powerful arsenal of tools.
The only thing that could immobilize the Fed would be an ACT OF THE U.S. CONGRESS.
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
ALOHA !!
Its amazing that Rosenberg is just now figuring out that raising rates will kill off all "low interest rate" based investments, especially housing. I can't wait until he figures out that raising interest rates will cause the US Treasury to pay more on the "marketable" US DEBT! The "non-marketable" US DEBT also depends on the US Treasuries although only as a guideline.
I love how the US FED makes it look like they are doing us lowly US citizens a favor when all along they are aiding further debt expansion through US DEBT accumulation at lower rates. Why else would there be record issuance of Treasuries now days? I mean why wait until the 10 year is at 10%? LOAD UP NOW! And that is exactly what the US Treasury is doing.
MONEY FLOWS
ALOHA !!
By studying money flows you can make money!
You may want to tunnelvision into one stock or go wide on the BIG PICTURE, but whatever way you go there is one irrefutable fact and that is that politics(US Treasury) combined with monetary policy(US FED) dictates what investments will be profitable and if you can be ahead of that curve then you can ride the trend. The US Treasury Daily Statement is nothing more than a daily record of the largest money flow machine in the entire World. For me NOT to watch that is like learning to skydive without a parachute!
A new addition to the money flow is this new military venture that started with Bush and continues to grow with Obama. Officially known as AFRICOM, we are now moving US military control into Africa. While the Communists in China use their massive US reserves to buy up commodity production, thanks to the hapless US consumers who bought the "credit estate" bubble, the USA wants to secure Africa with military "aid". China exerts its influence in Africa via financing and outright ownership. I am sure this causes consternation at the IMF and World Bank behind closed doors as this is direct competition for debt slavery.
AFRICOM is short for AFRICA COMMAND ... a military command post set up a year ago. Obama resoundingly supports this Bush military intervention as he has committed $278MIL to the effort so far in the FY 2010 budget. When Bush initiated the US AFRICA COMMAND-AFRICOM "transition team" it was funded with $50MIL USD, so now it has grown to nearly $300MIL.
LINK: http://www.africom.mil/getArticle.asp?art=1644
Scroll down to where the comments are at the bottom and read Annie Hunter in Moss Point where she questions AFRICOM and then the AFRICOM PR guy gets onto her and refutes all she says. Wow ... in all my research on US government websites I have never seen a PR guy get onto a commentator like that. Usually there is no comment at all. That's a first and worth a read! It shows you people are not trusting government much. I wonder why that could be?
Anybody see here what is going on? Our government has bought into the military industrial complex hook-line-n-sinker. We are now engaged in perpetual war. This is very EMPIRE!
Now how do you profit from all this EMPIRE? Well, you can bet on the US Dollar's demise which I have been doing since 2001 or you can join in the military expansion and buy stocks like LMT and GD. I have continually recommended LMT as they have one of the biggest piece of the EMPIRE pie(money flow) in terms of military adventures both past, present and future. Add in that they own most of the US Congress.
When I did some research on LMT I came across a private company based in Australia that LMT loves. The company is called MARAND PRECISION and it is family owned and started by an immigrant to Australia back in 1969.
LINK: http://www.marand.com.au/site/index.php?cat=marand...
Another major private Australian company I came across in my research was WELLARD. Yet another agriculture behemoth created by an immigrant to Australia back in the 1970s.
Two fabulous "real wealth" companies, the complete opposite of a Goldman Sachs! I would be a buyer if these companies ever did an IPO.
FD: I own no LMT shares but because my wife used to work at GD she does. I prefer XOM and CVX since Napoleon was wrong, an Army travels on its "gas" not its stomach!" Hummmm??
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
kaimu -
"I love how the US FED makes it look like they are doing us lowly US citizens a favor when all along they are aiding further debt expansion through US DEBT accumulation at lower rates. Why else would there be record issuance of Treasuries now days? I mean why wait until the 10 year is at 10%? LOAD UP NOW! And that is exactly what the US Treasury is doing."
Heck, the Fed stopped publishing M3 in 2005 for a reason. We've entered the Twighlight Zone of Fed policy to bury the public in cheap debt and thereby indefinately maintain the Federal Funds near zero, inflation be damned. Giant Squid and the HB&B can thus enjoy the fat margined returns on confiscated public funds through the U.S. equity markets via unchecked front running and quant programs. Gawd's work ...
Get yer gold, dag nabbit sonny! The Confidence game should end when real unemployment goes to 30% and I rope my belongings to a minivan and head to the new promise land.
As for now, I'm heading into the bowels of Detroit to see Bruce Springsteen tonight and bounce Ticketmaster's $20 beer off his head when he sings 'Workin' On A Dream' :)
Bubbles blowing
Bloomberg reports on APEC conference in Singapore: US exporting bubbles manifesting in unsustainable asset prices. Asian nations want to stay pegged. (US: "Dollar's your problem. Deal with it.") Tug of War.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&si...
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
Ominous indeed is the situation. I am also beginning to wonder about the crowding out of the private sector. Big Sister can't carry the load forever and should they want too...what is wrong with this picture?
Thanks Kaimu for continually educating and sounding the bell as we count down our future greatness, at least I think so, as an engine that could and more importantly would lead the less enlightened players in the world.
I have also missed Bev; has anyone heard from her...thanks?
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
Hi Telstar - The chart probably does not reflect many adjustable rate holders have already entered fixed rates over the last year in the low rate environment we are now in. Of course there is still a problem with many loans that are underwater or income & credit challenged borrowers that will hit the bank books in due course. In summary a large percentage of all resetting loans will not be a default in my estimation. Many borrowers enjoying resets now are going to lower rates, i.e. a typical five year fixed resetting to the sum of the one year libor (~1.1%) and the fixed margin (~2.25) now have a new rate of 3.375% for the next year or until they pull the trigger on the safey of a 30 year fixed. Happy Trading
PRIVATE MONEY FLOWS
ALOHA !!
The C WORD ... Trust is up for grabs!
Even those caviar eating RICH AND FAMOUS are nervous now ...
RAED ON:
Super-rich seen buying gold, selling hedge funds
By Steve Lodge
Financial Times, London
Friday, November 13, 2009
LINK: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/cf7e4434-d03d-11de-a8db-...
The investment preferences of the world's wealthiest families have shifted significantly in favour of gold and other commodities and away from hedge funds in the wake of the financial crisis, according to a survey of family offices and advisers of the super-rich.
Two-thirds of the 100 respondents to a survey by the Family Office Channel, a new website, said that super-rich families are now more likely to invest in gold and other commodities. They are also more interested in bond investments and in holding higher amounts of cash as part of an "instinctive retreat to ultra-safe asset classes."
By contrast, two-thirds of respondents said the wealthiest families are less likely to invest in hedge funds and structured products -- investments offering capital protection -- with one in three reporting "greatly reduced" interest in these holdings.
Private equity and commercial property are also much less popular asset classes, while attitudes to residential property investment remain largely unchanged.
The findings confirm reports of a flight to "safer" asset classes, says the survey. Wealthy families' risk appetites have suffered from frauds uncovered in the financial crisis as well as the poor performance of investments. More than nine out of 10 respondents said the level of trust in financial institutions and investment advisers has been hit by the Madoff and Stanford frauds.
"Madoff, Stanford, and bank failures are not necessarily seen as one-offs -- families clearly feel they cannot rule out the idea that the failings symbolised by these events are systemic," according to the survey, which was conducted last month.
It also found that more than half of wealthy families have recently reviewed their tax position and structures as a result of increased scrutiny from tax authorities.(more)
Re: Bull Hunter
@Bull Hunter,
I am really sorry for misspelling your name Bill Hunter instead of Bull Hunter.
Best Regards,
giasong
Some IT information (latest is 11-13-09)
http://www.eweek.com/c/b/Midmarket/
Re: Bill Hunter
Bull Hunter i find it very helpful and marked your comment with all the stars i could! ;)
Re: Bull Hunter
No problem, giasong.
Thanks to Bill Cara and everyone else for the kind words and private messages about the daily Cara 100 Ratings Changes report.
It's back up and running.
Regards,
BH
Landry thinks
He thinks he sees some shorts setting up. Any opinions?
edit: he also thinks SRS is a potential bottoming stock and that RIMM is everywhere, so he will stay away from it.
I could not help myself...I sold FSLR for a quick 2% profit, but will reacquire it on a pull back if it allows...still in RIMM, but I have a reasonable stop at 60.00
If interested: http://tinyurl.com/ye6s4tq
Have a wonderful weekend all!
Check back for that commentary you all.
Paulson Adds $1.5 Billion Of Citi Stock...
Paulson Adds $1.5 Billion Of Citi Stock, Sells Entire Goldman Stake And Some Bank Of America
http://tinyurl.com/y9sewxo
Ray Dalio - Bridgewater's 2001 "depression gauge", etc.
Bridgewater, now the world's largest hedge fund, builds portfolios from "multiple non-correlated return streams". Leverage is only 4:1. Ray Dalio also has impressive insights into the crash and current aftermath. Here are a few sources on his wisdom:
enlightening 18 minute audiocast: http://www.pionline.com/article/20090406/FREE/9040...
If you don’t know his style, it’s best to read this before listening:
http://cnnmoney.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?...
check this out: In 2001 he had his investment team build a "depression gauge" into the firm's computer system, line by line in the code, to adjust the portfolio's strategy and risk profile if the economy ever entered a massive deleveraging period ... On Sept. 30 of last year, just a couple of weeks after the failure of Lehman Brothers, Dalio logged into his system and saw that the computer had flipped the switch. Bridgewater's black box is now operating on high alert.
The above are from March, April, 2009, and show an impressive discipline and insight as to what’s likely to happen over the next few years .
Also, his February, 2009 interview in Barrons was very good:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://4.bp.bl...
Re: Ray Dalio - Bridgewater's 2001 "depression gauge", etc.
ALOHA !!
The Barrons interview has Dalio talking about "restructuring" everything from household debt to GM to banks to everything but the only thing in the most dire need of restructuring for the past 96 years ... our monetary system. He speaks in terms of "symptoms" and "band-aids". He misses the cancer.
Re: I think you might like this movie (1 hour +/-)
Thanks for sharing this video suggestion, Bill; I'd never heard of Chevalier des St. Georges. You've given me a nice seed for a lesson plan which I hope will inspire some of the wonderful International students I teach.
Cheers.
Re: Paulson Adds $1.5 Billion Of Citi Stock...
added more...
Re: FED CAN'T RAISE RATES UNTIL AFTER 2011
Hey Strangelove, first off, I run on the premise that the FED will not even think of raising rates until unemployment peaks and begins to turn down. This is how the FED has acted historically and I do not expect them to change stripes this time around.
I’m sure you have noticed that the banks are taking all the free money and hoarding it on their balance sheets. Why should they lend out to weak borrowers when they can just buy the 20 year treasury and make 3.5% spread for basically doing nothing. They also know that many commercial real estate loans are coming due which they have on their books and the CRE assets do not support their outstanding loans. This is another reason why they are not lending so their capital reserve ratios do not fall to levels which cause the FED to declare insolvency and have them liquidated or taken over.
This leads me to conclude that although he FED could alter/raise reserve ratios to contract money supply, it does not have a snowball’s chance in hell of happening anything soon. Last I checked the FED is trying save the banks not put them under.
The whole point of quantitative easing is to increase the velocity of money in circulation and raising reserve ratios is in opposition to quantitative easing. The FED St. Louis’ adjusted monetary base has recently broke out to new highs. What one needs to understand here is that rather than curtailing liquidity in the system, the FED is again aggressively injecting it.
Why is that?
Luggie, thank you for your insights, I will keep that in mind when looking at that graph. Here is another graph, slightly different.
Never have so few done so much for so many
As one of the rare posters who has gained so much from so few, Bill Cara has finally succeeded in drawing me out of my Cave, and rightly so.
Trying to regulate this site has to be done, however, this is like taking your kids, to a Toronto Maple Leafs hockey game, there they have rules, because they are professionals athletes, here we are semi pros, playing, flag football, and road hockey for free, trying to protect our livelihood.
Korvus, your the man on the spot, KISS keep it simple, let the police do their job, when three people object to vulgarity, or a blogger pumping, just toast em.
The people on this site can spot spam, and other blogger's in a heartbeat.
Democracy is great as long as you pay to participate in it. Charge 10.00 - 50.00 to have access to this site, and donate it to charity, end of problem, and you will get much more input, and cut down on spam.
Re: MONEY FLOWS
"Anybody see here what is going on? Our government has bought into the military industrial complex hook-line-n-sinker. We are now engaged in perpetual war. This is very EMPIRE!"
This is one possibility. But it is also unwise to seek isolationism. Someone will fill any power void and we have certainly seen a lot of outright butchery between Africans in recent times.
Another aspect to consider is the spread of radical Muslim activity in Africa.
The terrorist attack at Ft. Hood serves as a reminder that whether we "want war" or not it can be imposed on us from many locations.
We need to keep an open mind, but be watchful.
Traders Mind
Found this file on my computer today,so much info. saved thats useless, but this little graphic sums up a lot in one chart, I have been through everyone of the stages listed and probably more.Thought I would share it,I managed to upload it online.
http://tinyurl.com/yhl7rnc